Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 24:641-644 (1984)
© 1984 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zimmermann, M. J. O.
Right arrow Articles by Waines, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zimmermann, M. J. O.
Right arrow Articles by Waines, J. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zimmermann, M. J. O.
Right arrow Articles by Waines, J. G.

Heritabilities of Grain Yield of Common Bean in Sole Crop and in Intercrop with Maize1

Maria J. O. Zimmermann, Arnold A. Rosielle and J. Giles Waines2

Standard unit heritabilities for grain yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) were determined for F2-derived F4 and F~ progenies and for F2 individual plants and their F3 progenies of three common bean crosses. Standard unit heritabilities were determined by correlating F2-derived F4 line grain yields with F2-derived F5 line grain yields. Heritabilities were determined for direct selection (F4 and F5 lines in the same cropping system) and indirect selection (F4 and F5 lines in different cropping systems). Selection gains were also estimated for direct selection, indirect selection, and for selection based on the means of both systems. Parent-offspring genotypic correlations were determined for the F2-derived F4 and F5 progenies. Standardized correlated responses to selection for grain yield based on selection for harvest index were estimated for F2 individual plants. Standard unit heritabilities were larger in intercrop than in sole crop. The difference in heritability between cropping systems was larger for F2 plants than for the F2-derived F4 progenies. Direct selection in intercrop and sole crop was always superior to indirect selection in the alternate cropping system. Indirect selection in intercrop for sole crop gave the lowest gains. Direct selection in intercrop or in sole crop gave the highest genetic gains in each respective cropping system. Selection on the mean of both systems gave gains in each system almost as high as those of direct selection. Selection in sole crop for improvement in the mean of both systems resulted in lower gains than selection on the mean of both systems, but was better than selection in intercrop. Standardized correlated responses in grain yield by selection for harvest index were larger in intercrop than in sole crop. Single plant selection for yield may be effective for beans which are intercropped.

Key Words: Phaseolus vulgaris L. • Harvest index • Standardized correlated responses


1 Contribution of the Dep. of Botany and Plant Sci., Univ. of California, Riverside. Research supported in part by EMPBRAPA, California Agric. Exp. Stn., and USAID Title XII. Research conducted by senior author in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree at the Univ. of California.

2 Graduate student, assistant professor, and associate professor, Dep. of Botany and Plant Sci., Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521,

Received for publication May 20, 1983.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1984 by the Crop Science Society of America.