Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 24:453-456 (1984)
© 1984 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Casler, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Drolsom, P. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Casler, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Drolsom, P. N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Casler, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Drolsom, P. N.

Yield Testing Cool-Season Forage Grasses in Pure Stands vs. Binary Mixtures with Alfalfa1

M. D. Casler and P. N. Drolsom2

Cool season perennial forage grasses are grown in pure stands and in mixtures with other grasses or legumes. Differential environmental and competitive effects between pure and mixed stands may cause interactions with cultivars or breeding lines. Our objective was to compare the productivity of cultivars of four cool-season perennial forage grasses in pure stands and binary mixtures with alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Cultivars of orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.), smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis Leyss.), tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb), and timothy (Phleum pratense L.) were grown in replicated trials in pure stands and binary mixtures with alfalfa at five Wisconsin locations for up to three seasons. Differences among cultivars were significant for 12 of 38 species-environment combinations in pure stands and eight in mixed stands. Coefficients of variation were slightly higher for pure stands, while the square root of broad sense heritability showed no consistent differences between stand types. Rank correlations for cultivar yield between the two stand types were generally nonsignificant for all species, except timothy. Both stand types were about equally susceptible to cultivar x environment interaction, except cultivar x year interaction for timothy. We concluded that additional replication is necessary to obtain the desired level of precision in forage yield trials. With the possible exception of timothy, recommendations of superior grass cultivars in alfalfa mixtures should be based on mixed stand performance.

Key Words: Bromus inermis Leyss • Dactylis glomerata L • Festuca arundinacea Schreb • Medicago sativa L • Phleum pratense L • Evaluation • Grass breeding • Heritability


1 Contribution of the Dep. of Agronomy, Wisconsin Agric. Exp. Stn., Madison. Research supported by the College of Agricultural and Life Sci., Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.

2 Assistant professor and professor.

Received for publication June 29, 1983.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1984 by the Crop Science Society of America.