HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Aparicio-Tejo, P. Articles by Boyer, John. S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Aparicio-Tejo, P. Articles by Boyer, John. S. Agricola Articles by Aparicio-Tejo, P. Articles by Boyer, John. S.

Significance of Accelerated Leaf Senescence at Low Water Potentials for Water Loss and Grain Yield in Maize¹

Productivity is lost when plants are subjected to dry soil conditions and this loss is often accompanied by the senescence of leaf tissue. The role of leaf senescence in water conservation and grain production was therefore evaluated in maize (Zea mays L.) subjected to low water potentials for most of the grain filling period. The plants were grown in soil in controlled environment chambers and water was withheld from the soil after pollination had occurred. Low leaf water potentials were maintained for 30 days (until the grain matured) by daily addition of small amounts of water to the soil. The low water potentials (–1.8 to –2.0 MPa) inhibited dry matter accumulation and transpiration by the plants. However, in addition to the initial inhibition of transpiration by stomatal closure, there was a further inhibition (about 11% of the control rate) associated with accelerated senescence of the leaves. Excision of senesced leaf tissue showed that, despite this inhibition of water loss attributable to senescence, the dead tissue itself continued to lose a small amount of water while attached to the plants. Although the low water potentials were of long enough duration to allow significant acclimation of the plants, the senescing tissue contributed only a small amount of dry matter to the grain by mobilizing leaf constituents. Since the amount of water conserved by the senescing tissue was also small, it is likely that accelerated leaf senescence contributes little to grain production at low water potentials and has the disadvantage that it sacrifices potential photosynthetic surface. Therefore, selection against accelerated senescence of leaves at low water potentials may be desirable for crops.

Key Words: Zea mays L. • Grain yield • Dry weight • Transpiration

² Assistant professor, Dep. Fisiologia Vegetal, Univ. de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain and plant physiologist, USDA-ARS, Dep. of Botany and Dep. of Agronomy, 289 Morrill Hall, Univ. of Illinois, 505 S. Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801.

Received for publication December 27, 1982.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. S. Boyer and J. E. McLaughlin Functional reversion to identify controlling genes in multigenic responses: analysis of floral abortion J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2007; 58(2): 267 - 277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. E. Brevedan and D. B. Egli Short Periods of Water Stress during Seed Filling, Leaf Senescence, and Yield of Soybean Crop Sci., November 1, 2003; 43(6): 2083 - 2088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.C. Chapman and G.O. Edmeades Selection Improves Drought Tolerance in Tropical Maize Populations: II. Direct and Correlated Responses among Secondary Traits Crop Sci., September 1, 1999; 39(5): 1315 - 1324. [Abstract] [Full Text]