Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 23:1127-1132 (1983)
© 1983 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Umemura, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kawano, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Umemura, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kawano, K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Umemura, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kawano, K.

Field Assessment and Inheritance of Resistance to Cassava Bacterial Blight1

Yoshiki Umemura and Kazuo Kawano2

Cassava bacterial blight (CBB), caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. manihotis (Berthet and Boudar) Dye, caused 18 to 92% yield reduction on susceptible cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) clones relative to resistant clones depending on location, planting time, and level of simultaneous infection by superelongation disease caused by Elsinoe brasiliensis. Root dry matter content of susceptible clones was much lower than that of resistant clones. Susceptible clones did not produce planting stakes for next planting. No cassava clone under study was immune to CBB. Cultivar order of resistance was stable over years. The CBB on leaves of resistant clones spread slowly while on susceptible clones it spread rapidly causing defoliation and death of stem. Resistance appeared to be a quantitatively inherited trait (h2 = 0.63) largely controlled by additive genetic factors and was not negatively correlated with yielding ability per se. Cassava resistance to CBB is highly effective in minimizing damage caused by CBB, and use of resistant parents in hybridizations combined with simple phenotypic field selection under high natural disease pressure should effectively improve resistance of cassava cultivars.

Key Words: Manihot esculenta Crantz • Xanthomonas campestris pv. manihotis (Berthet and Boudar) Dye • Elsinoe brasiliensis • Quantitative trait • Additive genetic factors • Yield


1 Contribution from a joint project of Centro Int. de Agric. Tropical (CIAT, A.A. 67-13, Cali, Colombia) and Tropical Agricultural Res. Ctr. (TARC), Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishery, Tsukuba, Ibaraki-ken, Japan.

2 Visiting scientist (presently, plant breeder, TARC) and plant breeder (presently, CIAT Regional Office, Dep. of Agric., Bangkhen, Bangkok, Thailand), CIAT, respectively.

Received for publication November 26, 1982.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
K. Kawano
Thirty Years of Cassava Breeding for Productivity--Biological and Social Factors for Success
Crop Sci., July 1, 2003; 43(4): 1325 - 1335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1983 by the Crop Science Society of America.