Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 23:935-939 (1983)
© 1983 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Russell, W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Stuber, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Russell, W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Stuber, C. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Russell, W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Stuber, C. W.

Inheritance of Photosensitivity in Maize1

W. K. Russell and C. W. Stuber2

Sensitivity of maturity in maize (Zea mays L.) to photoperiod restricts exchange of germplasm across latitude. To investigate the inheritance of this trait, the differences in photosensitivity between B68 and Tx61M (Exp. 1) and between C3 and Tx601 (Exp. 2) were investigated using total leaf number as a measure of maturity. In Exp. 1, the expected long-day responses were not observed in two North Carolina environments. In a phytotron environment, both B68 and Tx61M exhibited significant photosensitivity; however, Tx61M, which averaged 7.6 more leaves under the longer photoperiod, was four times more sensitive than B68. In Exp. 2, evaluations were conducted in Florida (fall planting), North Carolina (spring planting), and under short-day and long-day photoperiods in a phytotron. Tx601 produced 4.4 more leaves in North Carolina than in Florida, and this was thought to be a photoperiodic response. An even greater photosensitivity was exhibited by Tx601 in the phytotron. A primary objective in Exp. 2 was to determine if photosensitivity in maize is simply inherited. An evaluation of the distribution of backcross-derived lines was unsuccessful in resolving this issue. In both experiments a generation mean analysis indicated a preponderance of additive gene action.

Key Words: Corn • Leaf number • Pollen shed • Short-day maturity • Photoperiod • Phytotron • Generation mean analysis • Gene number


1 Joint contribution from USDA-ARS and the North Carolina Agric. Res. Serv., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, N.C. 27650. Paper no. 8559 of the Journal Series.

2 Former graduate research assistant in genetics (now with Pioneer Hi-Bred Int., Inc.) and research geneticist, USDA-ARS, and professor of genetics, North Carolina State Univ.

Received for publication November 2, 1982.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1983 by the Crop Science Society of America.