Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 23:734-736 (1983)
© 1983 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barrow, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Barrow, J. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Barrow, J. R.

Comparisons among Pollen Viability Measurement Methods in Cotton1

Jerry R. Barrow2

Methods for measuring pollen viability were compared to determine their relative value in evaluating cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) pollen. Pollen was treated at constant temperature of 30, 33, 35, 37, 40, and 43°C for 15 hours prior to anthesis. Treated and untreated pollen were evaluated using several common techniques. Pollen killed at the highest temperature (43°C) stained readily with a cytoplasmic stain indicating that stains of this type may determine pollen maturity, but not viability. Pollen treated at 33 to 40°C responded positively to vital staining and germinated both on artificial media and on the stigma while pollen treated at 43°C did not. However, pollen fertility (as measured by pollen tubes penetrating the lower style and ovules) was severely reduced at 33°C and absent at 35°C. The best available criterion for pollen fertility appears to be tube penetration into the lower style or ovules. Staining and pollen germination methods are not accurate indicators of pollen fertility in cotton.

Key Words: Pollen fertility • Pollen staining • Pollen germination • Pollen tube • Fertilization • Sterility


1 USDA-ARS, in cooperation with the New Mexico Agric. Exp. Stn., Las Cruces, NM 88003.

2 Research geneticist, USDA-ARS, Cotton Breeding, Las Cruces, NM 88003.

Received for publication August 30, 1982.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
V. G. KAKANI, K. R. REDDY, S. KOTI, T. P. WALLACE, P. V. V. PRASAD, V. R. REDDY, and D. ZHAO
Differences in in vitro Pollen Germination and Pollen Tube Growth of Cotton Cultivars in Response to High Temperature
Ann. Bot., July 1, 2005; 96(1): 59 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
W. A. Pline, K. L. Edmisten, T. Oliver, J. W. Wilcut, R. Wells, and N. S. Allen
Use of digital image analysis, viability stains, and germination assays to estimate conventional and glyphosate-resistant cotton pollen viability
Crop Sci., November 1, 2002; 42(6): 2193 - 2200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1983 by the Crop Science Society of America.