Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 23:651-654 (1983)
© 1983 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rice, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Dudley, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rice, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Dudley, J. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rice, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Dudley, J. W.

Comparison of Genetic Models for Inbreeding in Autotetraploids Using Maize Data1

J. S. Rice and J. W. Dudley2

In an attempt to clarify inbreeding depression in autotetraploids, three models for inbreeding depression were compared using data from autotetraploid maize (Zea mays L.). Generations included were S1 through S4 and full-sib generations 1 through 6. The first genetic model was µ1 = µ + 6Fßii + (4P0 + P1){gamma}iii + P0{delta}iii + P2{delta}iijj (Gallais). The second model (Hill's) was µ1 = µ + pq(D + 2pT + p2,Q) + Pq(q - P) (T + pQ) + pQ) + p2q2Q. Hill's model can be applied with or without assumptions about the origin of the parents for the inbreds. It was fit with the assumption of a source population in random mating equilibrium in this study except for a comparison involving four selfed generations. The third model fit the first four powers of F (coefficient of inbreeding). Deviations from fitting powers of F were significant in 10 of 20 cases while deviations from the other models were significant in only four. Thus, the F model was considered unsatisfactory. Comparison of Hill's model with no assumption of equilibrium with Gallais' model and Hill's model with assumption of equilibrium revealed no significant differences. Although no clear evidence from fits to data favored either model, it appears reasonable to conclude that Gallais' model or Hill's model assuming equilibrium is more appropriate when the source population was at equilibrium and that Hill's model without assumptions may be more appropriate when the equilibrium assumption is not possible.

Key Words: Generation means • Full-sib mating • Gene interactions • Zea mays L.


1 Contribution from the South Carolina Agric. Exp. Stn. as Technical Paper no. 2089.

2 Associate professor, Dep. of Agronomy and Soils, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29631 and professor of plant genetics, Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana 61801.

Received for publication December 6, 1982.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1983 by the Crop Science Society of America.