Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 23:590-592 (1983)
© 1983 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baker, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Briggs, K. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Baker, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Briggs, K. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Baker, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Briggs, K. G.

Relationships between Plant Density and Yield in Barley1

R. J. Baker and K. G. Briggs2

To determine the effects of plant density on shoot weight and grain yield of spring barley, Hordeum vulgare L., ten cultivars were planted on square grids at densities of 1.56, 6.25, 25, 100, and 400 plants/m2 in each of 3 years, 1977-1979. Twenty plants were harvested from each plot (one replicate in 1977; two in 1978 and 1979) for determination of total shoot weight and grain yield per plant. The yield/density relationship was best described by the reciprocal regression equation, w-1 = a + bd, where w was the total shoot weight or grain yield (g/plant) and d was the plant density (plants/m2). Coefficients of determination varied from 66.4 to 99.5% with an average of 90.3% for total shoot weight and from 68.5 to 99.6% with an average of 89.1% for grain yield. The coefficient a, a measure of apparent maximum yield per plant, was influenced primarily by differences among cultivars. On the other hand, b, which is an estimate of the asymptotic yield per unit area, showed a significant cultivar x year interaction for both total shoot weight and grain yield.

Key Words: Hordeum vulgare L. • Response curves • Weighted regression • Transformations


1 This research was supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Grant No. A6029 to the Univ. of Alberta.

2 Senior research scientist, Crop Development Ctr., Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada S7N OWO; and professor, Dep. of Plant Science, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada T6G 2H1.

Received for publication June 3, 1982.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
M. Huhn
Estimating yield depression caused by nonuniformity of spatial plant patterns
Crop Sci., January 1, 2003; 43(1): 421 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1983 by the Crop Science Society of America.