Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 23:569-571 (1983)
© 1983 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, R. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, R. M.

Stability Parameters of Soybean Cultivars in Maturity Groups VI, VII, and VIII1

D. B. Weaver, D. L. Thurlow and R. M. Patterson2

Environmental stability parameters were estimated for adapted soybean[Glycine max (L.) Merr.] cultivars for two 3-year periods 28 environments in central and southern Alabama. Objectives were to measure and compare relative stabilities of the cultivars and to compare the effect of the different periods and productivity levels on the stability parameter estimates. In Exp.1 (1976–1978)n ine adapted cultivars (Maturity Groups VI, VII, and VIII) and one unadapted cultivar (Maturity Group V) were analyzed.In Exp 2 (1979–1981) 12 adapted cultivars and one Maturity Group V cultivar were analyzed. Seven cultivars were common to both experiments. ‘Forrest,’ the Maturity Group V cultivar, had the lowest or nearly the lowest seed yield and highest deviations from regression in both experiments. In Exp.1 , all cultivars except ‘Coker 338’ had significant deviations from regression, and ‘Coker 136’, ‘Ransom’, and ‘Hutton’ had significant regression coefficients. In Exp. 2, ‘Bragg’, Ransom and ‘Coker 488’ had nonsignificant deviations from regression, and ‘Centennial’, ‘Coker 237’, and Hutton had significant regression coefficients. Joint regression analyses of both experiments revealed that a major part of the genotype x environment interaction could be accounted for by differences between the fitted regression lines. Differing levels of productivity of the two experimental periods had little effect on stability parameter estimates.

Key Words: Glycine max (L.) Merr. • Genotype x environment interaction • Yield • Adaption


1 Contribution from the Dep. of Agronomy and Soils, Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ.

2 Assistant professor and associate professor of agronomy, and professor of research data analysis, respectively; Auburn Univ., Auburn University, AL 36849.

Received for publication September 20, 1982.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1983 by the Crop Science Society of America.