HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Morgan, J. A. Articles by Willis, W. O. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Morgan, J. A. Articles by Willis, W. O. Agricola Articles by Morgan, J. A. Articles by Willis, W. O.

Gas Exchange and Water Relations of ‘Olaf’ Spring Wheat¹

Experiments have been performed previously in which one or a small number of microclimate and water relations factors were investigated in relation to their effect on apparent photosynthesis in wheat, but little progress has been made attempting to monitor several of these factors in a single field study of canopy apparent photosynthesis (AP). In the present study, several microclimate and plant variables of field grown wheat plants, subjected to two irrigation regimes, were monitored to observe their combined effect on chamber measurements of AP. Dirunal AP and evapotranspiration (ET) measurements were taken on ‘Olaf’ spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) on 5 days from heading through late milk growth stages. Plants were irrigated either weekly (W) or biweekly (BW). A sequential analysis of covariance of the total data set showed AP was significantly associated with flag leaf stomatal resistance and water potential, canopy air temperature, leaf area index (LAI), irradiance, date, and time day. The consistently higher AP rates of treatment W were attributed mostly to higher values of LAI and water potential, and lower stomatal resistances, compared to treatment BW. Although reductions in leaf area and increases in stomatal resistance resulted in less ET for treatment BW, AP was reduced proportionately more by the effects of biweekly irrigation. Thus, water use efficiency was always greater for treatment W. Maximum AP rates alway occurred in the morning and earlier than maximum rates of ET. This observation was attributed partly to warmer afternoon temperatures, which increased ET and, in combination with lowered leaf water potentials, decreased AP. As a result, photosynthetic capacity was always greater in the morning than the afternoon. However, time of day still affected AP significantly after accounting for all of the variability associated with these and other measured variables which were known to affect AP. Based on measurements taken for both treatments, stomata appeared to be generally more open after than before anthesis. On the final day of measurements, stomata of treatment BW were closing, apparently in response to leaf aging.

Key Words: Canopy photosynthesis • Evapotranspiration • Leaf water potential • Leaf stomatal resistance • Triticum aestivum L.

² Research agronomist and soil scientist, USDA-ARS, A.E.R.C., CSU Foothills Campus, Fort Collins, CO 80523.

Received for publication June 30, 1982.