Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 23:343-346 (1983)
© 1983 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ross, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ross, J. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ross, J. P.

Effect of Soybean Mosiac on Component Yields from Blends of Mosiac Resistant and Susceptible Soybeans1

J. P. Ross2

To gain information on how yield reductions are generated by soybean mosaic under field conditions, experiments were conducted during four seasons to study the competition, as reflected in seed yield, between healthy and mosaic-infected soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] plants. Three pairs of closely related soybean mosaic virus (SMV)- resistant (R) and -susceptible (S) sibling soybean lines were planted in blends of 10, 20, 40, 60, and 80% R and complementary S seed. Natural virus sources were present at one location, and at the other location a virus source was provided for aphid transmission into the plots. Using total yields, plant stand counts during August or September, and the R or S reaction of seedlings grown from seed harvested from each plot, average yields per R and S plant were calculated for each blend. Yields per R plant generally increased as the percentage of R plants in the blend decreased, whereas yields per S plant varied only slightly among the various blends. Total yields generally increased with increasing percentages of R plants; however, this yield varied among seasons, locations, and sibling lines. The line with ‘Semmes’ as the recurrent susceptible parent manifested the greatest yield response. Yield compensation by nonlnfected soybean plants in fields with mosaic probably plays a major role in moderating yield loss.

Key Words: Glycine max (L.) Merr. • Soybean mosaic virus • Compensation


1 Cooperative investigations of the USDA, ARS, and the North Carolina Agric. Res. Service Raleigh. Paper No. 8260 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina Agric. Res. Service, Raleigh.

2 Plant pathologist, USDA, ARS and Dep. of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27650.

Received for publication April 19, 1982.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J HeredHome page
G. Ma, P. Chen, G. R. Buss, and S. A. Tolin
Genetic Study of a Lethal Necrosis to Soybean Mosaic Virus in PI 507389 Soybean
J. Hered., May 1, 2003; 94(3): 205 - 211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J HeredHome page
L. Liao, P. Chen, G. R. Buss, Q. Yang, and S. A. Tolin
Inheritance and Allelism of Resistance to Soybean Mosaic Virus in Zao18 Soybean From China
J. Hered., November 1, 2002; 93(6): 447 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1983 by the Crop Science Society of America.