Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 23:325-328 (1983)
© 1983 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schweizer, E. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schweizer, E. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schweizer, E. E.

Cultivar x Herbicide Interaction in Sugarbeet1

G. A. Smith and E. E. Schweizer2

Eight commercial sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars consisting of both diploid 2N = 2X = 18 and triploid 2N = 3X = 27 hybrids were studied for 2 years for their response to three herbicide regimes. The specific registered sugarbeet herbicides consisted of preplanting applications of 1) cycloate (S-ethyl-N-ethylthiocyclohexanecarbamate) (3.4 kg/ha), 2) ethofumesate [(± >2-ethoxy-2,3-dihydro-3,3-dimethyl- 5-benzofuranyl methanesulfonate] (2.2 kg/ha), and 3) a mixture of ethofumesate (2.2 kg/ha) + diclofop |2-{4-{2,4-dichlorophenoxy) phenoxy] propanoic acidsj (1.7 kg/ha), each followed by a post-emergence mixture of desmedipham [ethyl m-hydroxycarbanilate carbanilate (ester)] and phenmedipham (methyl m-hydroxycarbanilate m-methylcarbanilate) both applied at 0.6 kg/ha. A fourth treatment regime was that of no herbicide application. The six characters examined were 45-day plant dry weight, harvest root weight, foliar suppression, stand count, sucrose, and purity. Differential herbicide and cultivar response was evidenced by significant year x herbicide, year x cultivar, and herbicide x cultivar interactions for several of the six characters analyzed. Although a significant second order interaction was detected for foliar suppression, none of the yield components (root weight, sucrose, purity) exhibited significant second order interactions. Certain cultivars were suppressed significantly less than others at 45 days and recovered the most by harvest time. Under favorable soil moisture and temperature conditions, the eight commercial cultivars showed reductions in total 45-day plant weight of 39 to 55% of their nontreated equivalent controls. In both years, early season suppression was mostly, but not entirely, overcome by harvest. Reductions averaged about 5%.

Key Words: Genotype x environment interaction • Herbicide tolerance • Resistance breeding • Cycloate • Ethofumesate • Phenmedipham • Desmedipham


1 Joint contribution of the USDA-ARS, and the Colorado State Univ. Exp. Stn., Published with the approval of the Director of the Colorado State Univ. Exp. Stn. as Scientific Paper No. 2791.

2 Research geneticist and research plant physiologist, USDA, Crops, Res. Lab., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523.

Received for publication October 20, 1982.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1983 by the Crop Science Society of America.