Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 23:302-306 (1983)
© 1983 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Francis, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Laing, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Francis, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Laing, D. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Francis, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Laing, D. R.

Maize Genotype by Cropping Pattern Interactions: Monoculture vs. Intercropping1

C. A. Francis, M. Prager, G. Tejada and D. R. Laing2

Breeding programs to develop new crop cultivars for small farm cropping systems must consider the range of intercrop patterns in which these cultivars will be used. Most research in the past has concentrated on selection for monoculture. The objective of this study was to evaluate cultivar by cropping pattern interactions in a set of maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes currently used by the international research centers and the Colombian national maize program. In three consecutive years at the Centro Internacional de Agriculture Tropical station (1,000 m elevation, 47 N Lat.), maize cultivars were planted at optimum densities for monoculture and intercropping with two types of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): a determine bush type and anindeterminate climber type. Optimum production conditions were attempted using irrigation and pesticides where needed. Average monoculture maize yields were about 5,000 kg/ha, with some cultivars producing up to 7,600 kg/ha. Intercropping with bush beans reduced maize yields in one year out of three. Intercropping with the more competitive climbing bean reduced maize yields in all 3 years. Significant yield differences among maize cultivars were found in all 3 cropping patterns each year. The cropping pattern by maize cultivar interaction was not significant for maize yields, however for bean yields there were differences among intercropped maize cultivars and a cultivar by cropping pattern interaction in the second and third years. Highly significant (P<0.01) correlations of maize yields between cropping patterns (r = 0.78 to 0.91) in second and third year data suggest consistency of results from one system to another. The significant difference in bean yields among maize cultivars emphasizes the importance of evaluating cropping patterns in terms of total production or income from both crops before making decisions on the best maize cultivar to recommend for intercropping.

Key Words: Multiple cropping • Corn-bean cropping patterns, • Cropping systems • Tropical agriculture • Selection • Zea mays L. • Phaseolus vulgaris L. • Small farm systems • Polyculture systems


1 Contribution from the Bean Program, Centro Int. de Agric. Trop. (CIAT), Apartado Aereo 6713, Cali, Colombia, and Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583. Published as Paper Number 6821, Journal Series, Nebraska Agric. Exp. Stn.

2 Agronomist (currently sorghum breeder, Univ. Nebraska), research assistants, and director of research, CIAT. Contributions of germplasm and collaboration from Dr. Steve Temple (CIAT), Dr. Gonzalo Granados (CIMMYT) and Dr. Fernando Arboleda (ICA) are gratefully acknowledged.

Received for publication March 12, 1982.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1983 by the Crop Science Society of America.