Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 23:116-120 (1983)
© 1983 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baenziger, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sicher, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Baenziger, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sicher, R. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Baenziger, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sicher, R. C.

The Effects of Genes Controlling Barley Leaf and Sheath Waxes on Agronomic Performance in Irrigated and Dryland Environments1

P. S. Baenziger2, D. M. Wesenberg3 and R. C. Sicher2

Epicuticular waxes have been associated with drought tolerance in numerous species. Several barley, Hordeum vulgare L., mutants have been identified that alter, generally lessen, epicuticular leaf and sheath waxes. These mutants have been used to study the biochemistry of leaf and sheath wax synthesis, however, they have not been examined for agronomic performance in droughty environments. Fourteen isolines and cultivars were grown in three irrigated and three dryland environments to determine the effect of barley leaf and sheath wax mutants on agronomic performance in irrigated and dryland environments. The irrigated environments had significantly greater yields and 1,000 kernel weights, but were not significantly different for test weight and kernel plumpness. A significant irrigated vs. dryland by cultivar interaction was found only for yield. No mutant isoline was significantly better than its normal counterpart for any of the agronomic traits measured in either the irrigated or dryland environments. Some of the mutant genes were deleterious as their isolines were significantly inferior to their normal counterpart in both the irrigated and dryland environments. Photosynthetic measurements made in a growth chamber were similar for the mutant isolines and their normal counterparts and were unable to explain the observed field inferiority of the mutant isolines.

Key Words: Eceriferum • Mutation


1 Contribution from ARS, USDA.

2 Research geneticist, Field Crops Lab., and research plant physiologist, Light and Plant Growth Lab., respectively, ARS, USDA, Beltsville Agric. Res. Ctr., Beltsville, MD 20705.

3 Research agronomist, ARS, USDA, Aberdeen Res. and Ext. Ctr., Aberdeen, ID 83210.

Received for publication February 25, 1982.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1983 by the Crop Science Society of America.