Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 22:1197-1202 (1982)
© 1982 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arihara, J.
Right arrow Articles by Crosbie, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Arihara, J.
Right arrow Articles by Crosbie, T. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Arihara, J.
Right arrow Articles by Crosbie, T. M.

Relationships among Seedling and Mature Root System Traits of Maize1

J. Arihara and T. M. Crosbie2

Maize (Zea mays L.) breeders often have resorted to various techniques, which measure root strength or type, in an effort to select for decreased root lodging. Seedling root traits of S1 lines selected for high and low mature root-pulling resistance in the field from C0 and C8 cycles of Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic [BSSS(R)] and Iowa Corn Borer Synthetic #1 [BSCB1(R)] were studied in a preliminary experiment. Also, we used 90 S1 lines from each of the C0 and C8 cycles of BSCB1(R) to estimate genetic parameters for seedling root-pulling resistance.

Estimates of heritability for seedling pulling resistance were 0.56 ± 0.15 and 0.42 ± 0.16 for 90 random S1 lines from each of the C0 and C8 cycles of BSCB1(R). Predicted genetic advance was 0.7 kg/plant for BSCB1(R)C0 and 0.6 kg/plant for BSCB1(R)C8. Estimates of S1 line x environment interactions for seedling pulling resistance of selected, low and high lines from C0 and C8 cycles of BSCB1(R) were not significant when measured in two greenhouse environments. Rank and genotypic correlation coefficients, however, between seedling root-pulling resistance and mature rootpulling resistance measured at two dates and between seedling pull and lodging were small (all r-values were lower than 0.33). Selection differentials for root pulling resistance at any stage suggested that selection would be more effective in discarding lodging-susceptible lines than in identifying those with superior lodging resistance. We have concluded that selection for high seedling root pulling resistance has limited utility in improving mature root strength of these populations.

Key Words: Zea mays L. • Selection advance • Heritability • Population improvement • Recurrent selection • Root pulling resistance


1 Joint contribution: Tohoku. Natl. Agric. Exp. Stn., Morioka, Iwate, Japan, and Journal Paper No. J-10570 of the Iowa Agric. and Home Econ. Exp. Stn., Ames, IA 50011. Project 2152.

2 Maize physiologist at Tohoku. Natl. Agric. Exp. Stn., Morioka, Iwate, Japan, and visiting scientist at Iowa State Univ. from 1981 to 1982; and former assistant professor, Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ., Ames. IA 50011; now director of research, Garst Seed Co., Coon Rapids, IA 50058.

Received for publication March 1, 1982.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1982 by the Crop Science Society of America.