Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 22:1151-1155 (1982)
© 1982 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shepherd, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shepherd, R. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Shepherd, R. L.

Genetic Resistance and its Residual Effects for Control of the Root-Knot Nematode-Fusarium Wilt Complex in Cotton1

Raymond L. Shepherd2

Two cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars and a breeding stock (‘Deltapine 16’, ‘Auburn 56’, and Auburn 623 RNR, respectively), having in order low, intermediate, and high resistance to the root-knot nematode-fusarium wilt disease complex [caused by Meloidogyne incognita acrita (Kofoid & White) Chitwood and Fusarium oxysporum Schlecht. f. vasinfectum (Atk.) Snyd. & Hans.], were grown in nematicide, DBCP (1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane), treated vs. untreated plots for 3 years.

Fumigation did not significantly increase lint yield of Auburn 623 RNR compared with 36 and 77% increases for Auburn 56 and Deltapine 16, respectively. Auburn 623 RNR without fumigation was more effective for controlling root-knot nematodes than Auburn 56 and Deltapine 16 with fumigation and was equally effective as those cottons with fumigation for controlling fusarium wilt disease. In unfumigated plots, Auburn 623 RNR vs. Auburn 56 and Deltapine 16 also had lower root-knot nematode numbers (83/500-cm3 of soil vs. 717 and 1,581, respectively) and lower fusarium wilt percentages (5% vs. 47%, respectively). In the fourth year of the study, susceptible ‘Stoneville 213’ cotton was grown without fumigation in all plots where the above cottons had been grown. Stoneville 213 following unfumigated Auburn 623 RNR had 147 kg/ha (21%) and 270 kg/ha (47%) higher lint yields than following unfumigated Auburn 56 and Deltapine 16, respectively. Stoneville 213 had smaller root-knot nematode populations following unfumigated Auburn 623 RNR than following fumigated Deltapine 16 and no greater incidence of fusarium wilt disease than when it followed fumigated Auburn 56 and Deltapine 16. If the high level of resistance exhibited by Auburn 623 RNR can be bred into cotton cultivars, it should reduce much of the present root-knot nematode and fusarium wilt damage to cotton and to susceptible crops following resistant cotton in rotations.

Key Words: Gossypium hirsutum L. • Meloidogyne incognita acrita (Kofoid & White) Chitwood • Fusarium oxysporum Schlecht. f. vacinfectum (Atk.) Synd. & Hans. • Rotation • Nematicide • Cotton breeding • Cotton nematodes


1 Contribution from Crop Science Research Unit, USDA-ARS, in cooperation with the Dep. of Agronomy & Soils, Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849.

2 Research agronomist, USDA-ARS, Auburn Univ., AL 36849.

Received for publication July 20, 1981.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1982 by the Crop Science Society of America.