Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 22:927-931 (1982)
© 1982 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Puri, Y. P.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Puri, Y. P.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, W. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Puri, Y. P.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, W. A.

Evaluation of Yield Components as Selection Criteia in Barley Breeding1

Y. P. Puri, C. O. Qualset and W. A. Williams2

A combination of statistical procedures was used to determine which yield components were most likely to be effective selection criteria for yield improvement in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). The procedures included: 1) simple phenotypic correlations between grain yield and its endpoint components, 2) ridge regression to determine which characters were strongly interrelated, and 3) multivariate models and path analysis. Each procedure was applied in a 2-year studyo f 25 near-homozygous spring barley selections from ‘Coast’/‘Lion’l/‘Winter Club’ and two check cultivars. Yield/plant (Y) was the primary measure of grain yield. Components measured were X1, spikes/plant; X2, kernels/spike; X3, kernel weight; and X4, kernel weight/spike. Two models were studied using original data and log transformed data: YA, involving X1, X2, and X3, and YB, involving X1 and X4. These relate to grain yleld/plant as YA = X1-X2-X3 and YB = X1-X4 because X4 = X2X-3. Phenotypic correlations gave unstable inter-year and intercharacter relationships. X3 and X4 were strongly correlated with Y. Path analysis of model YA identified X3 and model YB identified X4 as having stronger direct effects on yield than other characters. X4, weight/spike, was judged as the primary character worthy of further investigation as a simply applied selection criterion. Results of the analyses with the log transformed data were completely consistent and practically identical with the analyses of untransformed data.

Key Words: Hordeum vulgare L. • Ridge regression • Path analysis


1 Contribution from the Dep. of Agronomy and Range Science, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616.

2 Specialist, Agronomy and Range Science and superintendent, U.C. Tulelake Field Stn., Tulelake, CA 96134; professor of agronomy and range science, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616.

Received for publication June 5, 1981.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1982 by the Crop Science Society of America.