Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 22:817-822 (1982)
© 1982 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beard, B. H.
Right arrow Articles by Geng, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Beard, B. H.
Right arrow Articles by Geng, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Beard, B. H.
Right arrow Articles by Geng, S.

Interrelationships of Morphological and Economic Characters of Sunflower1

Benjamin H. Beard and Shu Geng2

Two phenotypically dissimilar open pollinated sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) cultivars, ‘Peredovik’ and ‘Tchernianka’, and two hybrids, ‘Romsun 52’ and ‘Seedtec 304’ (produced by genetic and cytoplasmic male sterile systems, respectively), were sown at different dates and seeding rates for two years. The four cultivars were planted as a 4 x 4 latin square. Within each of the four replications, dates of sowing were randomly assigned to strips across the four cultivars. Within each cultivar-sowing date combination, plant spacings were randomly assigned as 6-row subplots. Data were collected from ten plants per plot for a number of morphological characters and from the plants in the two center rows for yield and oil characters.

Principal component and path coefficient analyses indicate that even though these cultivars are phenotypically and genetically different, the response to date of planting, and the biological systems controlling the interrelationships between morphological, yield, and oil characters are similar. This may explain why some sunflower cultivars are superior at a wide range of locations, and at the same time are sensitive to environmental changes such as planting dates. The results also suggest that yield improvement through better management should apply to many types of cultivars in a wide range of environments.

Key Words: Principal component analysis • Path coefficient analysis • Date of planting • Rate of planting • Helianthus annuus L.


1 Cooperative investigations of the USDA, ARS, and the California Agric. Exp. Stn.

2 Research geneticist, USDA, ARS, and associate professor, Dep. of Agronomy and Range Science, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616.

Received for publication June 17, 1981.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
T. Hewezi, M. Leger, W. El Kayal, and L. Gentzbittel
Transcriptional profiling of sunflower plants growing under low temperatures reveals an extensive down-regulation of gene expression associated with chilling sensitivity
J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2006; 57(12): 3109 - 3122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
A. J. de la Vega and A. J. Hall
Effects of Planting Date, Genotype, and Their Interactions on Sunflower Yield: I. Determinants of Oil-Corrected Grain Yield
Crop Sci., July 1, 2002; 42(4): 1191 - 1201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
A. J. de la Vega and A. J. Hall
Effects of Planting Date, Genotype, and Their Interactions on Sunflower Yield: II. Components of Oil Yield
Crop Sci., July 1, 2002; 42(4): 1202 - 1210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1982 by the Crop Science Society of America.