Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 22:660-666 (1982)
© 1982 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wijesinha, A.
Right arrow Articles by De Aquino Portes, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wijesinha, A.
Right arrow Articles by De Aquino Portes, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wijesinha, A.
Right arrow Articles by De Aquino Portes, T.

Some Statistical Analyses for a Maize and Beans Intercropping Experiment

Anila Wijesinha, Walter T. Federer, Josy Ruy Carvalho and Tomas De Aquino Portes1

Several univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to observations from a single experiment involving sole crop and intercropped combinations of two maize (Zea mays L.) and four bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars. Some of the strengths and weaknesses of the analyses are indicated. For joint analyses on maize and bean yields, analyses for crop value or income, land equivalent ratios, and a multivariate analysis with maize yields as one variable and bean yields as a second variable, were performed on the data. The last analysis necessarily ignores sole crop yields. These different types of analyses provided insight into different aspects of an intercropping experiment. It was found that an intercropping system which maximized the yield of any one crop did not necessarily maximize total crop value or income or land equivalent ratio. This indicated that the type of analysis required clearly depended on the goals of the experiment, and that all these analyses may usefully be performed on an intercropping experiment. The conclusions from the multivariate analyses for this experiment were found to agree with those from the univariate analyses. All eight mixtures had a land equivalent ratio greater than one. Combined crop values computed for bean prices three times that of maize were larger for three of the eight mixtures than for the highest sole crop value for a tall maize cultivar. Considering total yield of maize plus beans, none of the mixtures yielded as high as the higher yielding maize cultivar. In considering combined yields in a multivariate analysis, yields of beans were relatively twice as important as maize yields in determining differences in total yield.

Key Words: Relay-cropping • Mix cropping • Univariate and multivariate analysis • Land equivalent ratio • General and specific mixing effects • function of combined yields of crops


1 Graduate student and Liberty Hyde Bailey professor, respectively, Biometrics Unit, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, New York 14853. Statistician and plant physiologist, respectively, National Res. Ctr. for Rice and Beans, Goiania, Goias, Brazil.

Received for publication March 26, 1981.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1982 by the Crop Science Society of America.