Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 22:641-645 (1982)
© 1982 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thuerer, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Doney, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Thuerer, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Doney, D. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Thuerer, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Doney, D. L.

Breeding for Resistance to the Sugarbeet Root Maggot1

J. C. Thuerer, C. C. Blickenstaff, G. G. Mahrt and Devon L. Doney2

Thirty-six genetically diverse sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) lines were evaluated to determine their potential resistance to the sugarbeet root maggot, Tetanops myopaeformis Roder. Significant and relatively consistent differences in maggot damage were noted over 3 years. Damage ratings of F1 crosses of resistant x susceptible lines tended to be intermediate between those of the parents. Selection for high- and low-maggot damage showed a linear trend in increasing and decreasing maggot damage, respectively. The average decline in the low-damage selection was approximately 5% per cycle. After five cycles of selection, there was no change in the rate of decline, indicating that further selection progress can be made. A greenhouse test confirmed field designations of resistant and susceptible genotypes. A low-damage inbred had lower maggot survival, smaller maggot weight, lower damage ratings, and greater root weight than a susceptible line.

Key Words: Beta vulgarisL • Tetanops myopaeformis Roder • Breeding for insect resistance • Diverent selection • Mass selection


1 Contribution of USDA/ARS and the Idaho and Utah Agric. Exp. Stns.

2 Research geneticist, USDA/ARS, Logan, UT 84322; research entomologist and agricultural research technician (insects), USDA/ARS, Kimbedy, ID, 83341; research geneticist, USDA/ARS, Logan, UT.

Received for publication July 31, 1981.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1982 by the Crop Science Society of America.