Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 22:503-506 (1982)
© 1982 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by McCaig, T. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by McCaig, T. N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by McCaig, T. N.

Evaluation of Techniques for Screening for Drought Resistance in Wheat1

John M. Clarke and Thomas N. McCaig2

Three techniques were evaluated for screening for drought resistance in rainfed and irrigated Triticum aestivum L. em Thell., and T. turgidum L. var. durum field plots, viz., leaf diffusive resistance as measured with an autoporometer, leaf temperature as measured with a hand-held infrared thermometer, and drying rate of excised leaves. Eight durum and 10 hexaploid cultivars of diverse origin were grown in each of two years. Yields under rainfed relative to irrigated conditions were used to characterize the drought resistance of the cultivars.

Neither diffusive resistance measurements nor leaf temperature were suitable screening techniques since differences between cutivars were not detected. There were marked differences in leaf temperatures between the rainfed and irrigated environments. Cultivar differences were detected in excised leaf water loss rate. Water retention capability was greatest early in the season, and dropped markedly after anthesis. The drought-hardy durum cultivar Pelissier had the best water retention capability. Progeny of a Pelissier x Hercules cross showed a range of retention capabilities between the parental values. Visual rating of excised leaves identified the genotypes with superior water retention capabilities. It was concluded that measurement of excised leaf water retention capability showed the most promise of the three techniques evaluated

Key Words: Triticum aestivum L. • Triticum turgidum L. var. durum • Leaf diffusive resistance • Infrared temperature • Excised leaf water loss • Visual selection


1 Contribution from Research Station, Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Swift Current, Saskatchewan. S9H 3X2

2 Research scientists, Research Station, Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Swift Current, Saskatchewan. S9H 3X2.

Received for publication March 23, 1981.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
K. D. Cameron, M. A. Teece, and L. B. Smart
Increased Accumulation of Cuticular Wax and Expression of Lipid Transfer Protein in Response to Periodic Drying Events in Leaves of Tree Tobacco
Plant Physiology, January 1, 2006; 140(1): 176 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1982 by the Crop Science Society of America.