Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 22:486-490 (1982)
© 1982 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Byrne, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Gracen, V. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Byrne, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Gracen, V. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Byrne, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Gracen, V. E.

Yield and Plant Growth Responses of Mononychellus Mite Resistant and Susceptible Cassava Cultivars under Protected vs. Infested Conditions

D. H. Byrne, J. M. Guerrero, A. C. Bellotti and V. E. Gracen2

Root yield, propagation material yield, and growth responses to Mononychellus mite (Acari:Tetranychidae) populations, and foliage damage ratings of resistant and susceptible cultivars (previously determined by foliage damage ratings) were compared in protected and unprotected plots to confirm the level of resistance, to relate foliage damage estimates with economic yield reductions, and to study the general effectof mite attacks on cassava. On the average, cassava cultivars selected as susceptible had larger reductions in leaf size, leaf life, leaf formation rate, plant height, root yield, yield of propagation material, root weight, root number, and percent marketable roots than did the resistant cultivars when compared to their respective performance in protected plots. The average yield loss for susceptible cultivars was 73% for roots and 67% for propagation material; the respective losses for the resistant cultivars were 15 and 19%. Our selection criterion for resistance (i.e., foliage damage ratings) was correlated with mite density and associated with the percent yield loss caused by the mites indicating this criterion's potential value in future breeding efforts, although exceptions exist due to the presence of tolerance.

Key Words: Manihot esculenta Crantz • Mononychellus tanajoa (Bondar) • Mononychellus caribbeanae (McGregor) • Tolerance • Host plant resistance • Acari • Tetranychid • Antibiosis • Nonpreference


2 Research associate (Present address: International Plant Research Institute, San Carlos, CA 94070), research assistant (CIAT, Cali, Colombia), cassava entomologist (CIAT, Cali, Colombia), and professor (Dep. of Plant Breeding and Biometry, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853).

Received for publication March 6, 1981.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1982 by the Crop Science Society of America.