Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 22:269-273 (1982)
© 1982 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ogbuehi, S. N.
Right arrow Articles by Brandle, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ogbuehi, S. N.
Right arrow Articles by Brandle, J. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ogbuehi, S. N.
Right arrow Articles by Brandle, J. R.

Influence of Windbreak-Shelter on Soybean Growth, Canopy Structure, and Light Relations1

S. N. Ogbuehi and J. R. Brandle2

Although changes in canopy morphology of soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] grown windbreak-sheltered plots have been reported, how these changes affect the canopy light climate has not been evaluated. This information is needed for a better understanding of the mechanisms of shelter influence on soybean production, and for satisfactory models of soybean growth and yield under these conditions. The objectives of the field study reported here were to determine the influence of windbreak-shelter on soybean canopy morphology, canopy light climate, growth, and bean yield. ‘Wayne’ soybeans were grown during the 1978 and 1979 growing seasons under windbreak-sheltered and exposed conditions at the University of Nebraska Field Laboratory, Mead, Nebraska. The soil was a Typic Arguidoll (Sharpsburg silty clay loam).

The sheltered soybeans were characterized by a significantly lower leaf area density and leaf density, and smaller leaf size in the uppermost portions of the canopy in comparison with those grown in exposed plots. Consequently, there was a greater penetration of the incident photosynthetically active radiation to lower canopy strata in sheltered soybeans.

Even though available soil water was similar for the treatments, sheltered soybeans had a more favorable plant water status. This was probably a consequence of lower atmospheric evaporative demand in shelter due to reduced wind-speed. Crop growth and bean yield were significantly increased in shelter obviously because of the better plant water status and canopy light climate. The number of pods per plant, seeds per pod and harvest index were increased in shelter.

Since soybean yield is limited by restriction of light penetration to lower canopy strata, cultivar selection on the basis of this morphological response to shelter should lead to increased soybean production. Models for predicting soybean performance need to accommodate any changes in canopy morphology.

Key Words: Glycine max (L.) Merr. • Models of growth


1 tPublished as Paper No. 6077 Journal Series, Nebraska Agric. Exp. Stn.

2 Research associate, UMUAHI, Imo State, Nigeria WA and associate professor, Dep. of Forestry, Fisheries and Wildlife, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583.

Received for publication September 4, 1980.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1982 by the Crop Science Society of America.