Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 22:30-35 (1982)
© 1982 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Isbell, V. R.
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, P. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Isbell, V. R.
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, P. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Isbell, V. R.
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, P. W.

Manipulation of Apical Dominance in Sorghum with Growth Regulators1

V. R. Isbell and P. W. Morgan2

The hormonal control of apical dominance (inhibition of lateral bud formation and development) in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] was studied by applying plant growth regulators to two cultivars—SM100 (weak apical dominance) and BTx378 (strong apical dominance). In the field, SM100 produced an average of 1 tiller per 2 plants before anthesis and BTx378 produced none. Following anthesis, apical dominance diminished in both cultivars. Spray applications of 0.2 mM gibberellic acid (GA3) during the initial 7 weeks of seedling growth completely inhibited bud outgrowth before anthesis in SM100. Bud outgrowth increased rapidly in both cultivars after termination of GA3 applications. This rapid increase in bud outgrowth was similar to the normal release from apical dominance ocurrlng in untreated plants following anthesis except that it was earlier, occurred at a more rapid rate, and a larger final number of buds was released. Thus, two aspects of the normal pattern of tiller bud development were mimicked by GA3 application: i) intensification of the inhibition of bud outgrowth before anthesis and ii) acceleration of bud outgrowth occurring after anthesis. In plants grown hydroponically in the greenhouse, GA3 again inhibited bud outgrowth in SM100 plants during the vegetative period. A role for gibberellin(s) in sorghum apical dominance is suggested because bud outgrowth was promoted in BTx378 plants by a gibberellin synthesis inhibitor, ancymidol. Evidence for the participation of auxins and cytokinins in sorghum apical dominance was also obtained. The auxin naphthaleneacetic acid inhibited bud outgrowth in SM100. In BTx378 the auxin transport inhibitor naphthylphthalamic acid and the cytokinin benzyladenine caused bud outgrowth which resembled that obtained by apical bud removal.

Key Words: Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench • Tillers • Lateral buds • Plant growth regulators • Gibberellins • Auxins • Cytokinins


1 Contribution from the Dep. of Plant Sciences, Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Texas A & M Univ., College Station, TX 77843. Part of the senior author's M.S. Thesis. Supported in part by Collaborative Research Grant No. AID/DSAN/XII/G-0149 from U.S. AID.

2 Formerly, graduate assistant (present address Texas A & M Res. and Ext. Ctr., Lubbock, Tex.) and professor of plant physiology, Texas A & M Univ., College Station, TX 77843.

Received for publication September 29, 1980.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. M. Frantz, D. Pinnock, S. Klassen, and B. Bugbee
Characterizing the Environmental Response of a Gibberellic Acid-Deficient Rice for Use as a Model Crop
Agron. J., July 1, 2004; 96(4): 1172 - 1181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1982 by the Crop Science Society of America.