Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 22:116-123 (1982)
© 1982 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Melkonian, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Steponkus, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Melkonian, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Steponkus, P. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Melkonian, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Steponkus, P. L.

Determination of the Volumetric Modulus of Elasticity of Wheat Leaves by Pressure-Volume Relations and the Effect of Drought Conditioning1

Jeffrey J. Melkonian, Joe Wolfe and Peter L. Steponkus2

A pressure-volume (P-V) method was modified to facilitate the rapid determination of more points in the positive turgor region of P-V dehydration curves of vernalized winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Yorkstar) leaves. This allowed for a more accurate estimate of the volumetric modulus of elasticity ({varepsilon}) and its dependence on turgor. P-V relations during dehydration in a pressure bomb were characterized for leaves from either well-watered plants (control,-solute potential, {psi}s = –1.0 MPa) or plants previously subjected to two stress cycles (conditioned, {psi}s = –1.4 MPa). Prior to P-V determinations, the plants were brought to maximumh ydration by thorough watering and maintenance in the dark for 12 hours (water potential {Psi} = –0.02 MPa and –0.07 MPa for control and conditioned leaves, respectively). Additionally, P-V relations of leaves from conditioned plants subjected to a third stress ({psi}s = –1.9 MPa) were determined. In this case, leaves were rapidly rehydrated in the pressure bomb prior to the P-V measurements. For leaves of both control and conditioned plants, {varepsilon} was constant and nonohysteretic over a range of applied pressure of 0.0 to 0.8 MPa, i.e., at high values of turgor. The turgor dependence of {varepsilon} at higher applied pressures (i.e., lower turgor pressures) was not considered because of the unresolvable influence of variations in {psi}s of individual cells in the leaf. Leaves of conditioned plants had a significantly higher {varepsilon} (28 MPa) than leaves of control plants (22 MPa). The value of {varepsilon} of leaves of plants subjected to three stress cycles and rapidly rehydrated in the pressure bomb before determination of the P-V relations increased to 40 MPa—significantly different from plants subjected to two stress cycles and slow rehydration.

Key Words: Triticum aestivum L. • Pressure bomb • Turgor potential • Solute potential • Capillary system


1 A contribution of the Dep. of Agronomy, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, N.Y. Dep. of Agronomy Series Paper No. 1389.

2 Graduate research assistant, research associate, and professor, respectively, Dep. of Agronomy, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, N.Y. 14853.

Received for publication March 24, 1981.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
H. A. PINHEIRO, F. M. DaMATTA, A. R. M. CHAVES, M. E. LOUREIRO, and C. DUCATTI
Drought Tolerance is Associated with Rooting Depth and Stomatal Control of Water Use in Clones of Coffea canephora
Ann. Bot., July 1, 2005; 96(1): 101 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1982 by the Crop Science Society of America.