Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 21:909-913 (1981)
© 1981 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fiscus, E. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fiscus, E. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fiscus, E. L.

Analysis of the Components of Area Growth of Bean Root Systems1

Edwin L. Fiscus2

Root and leaf surface areas were measured on green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Ouray) plants, with light intensity (photosynthetic photon flux density, PPFD) as the major growth variable, to determine how various sizes of roots are related to water transport and growth rates of whole-root systems. Plants were grown in aerated nutrient solution for 41 days in a greenhouse. Two light intensities were used: 425 and 320 µE m–2 sec–1 Leaf area:root area ratios, distribution of root sizes, and the fraction of the total root surface area of each root class were determined. All of these parameters remained stable for plants with leaf and root areas greater than 1,000 cm2 and they were unchanged by light intensity or growth rate. On the basis of previous data the mean root system hydraulic conductance (Lp) appeared to be keyed to plant size rather than age. The conductance was very low in small plants, increased about sixfold and peaked when the root systems reached approximately 1,000 cm2 surface area. For plants larger than 1,000 cm2, when the root size distributions were stabilized, conductance gradually declined, probably because of suberization or some other growth-related factor. Plants grown at lower light intensity showed the same pattern of relationships between root system size, root size distribution, and hydraulic conductance except that the overall Lp was consistently lower for plants of similar sizes.

Key Words: Root water transport • Root growth model • Root conductance


1 Contribution from USDA-SEA-AR, Fort Collins, Colorado.

2 Plant physiologist, USDA-SEA-AR, Irrigation and Soil-Plant-Water Relations Research Group, Crops Research Laboratory, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523.

Received for publication February 12, 1981.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
S. D. Merrill, D. L. Tanaka, and J. D. Hanson
Comparison of Fixed-Wall and Pressurized-Wall Minirhizotrons for Fine Root Growth Measurements in Eight Crop Species
Agron. J., September 19, 2005; 97(5): 1367 - 1373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
S. D. Merrill, D. L. Tanaka, and J. D. Hanson
Root Length Growth of Eight Crop Species in Haplustoll Soils
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2002; 66(3): 913 - 923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1981 by the Crop Science Society of America.