Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 21:511-514 (1981)
© 1981 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Quisenberry, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Dilbeck, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Quisenberry, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Dilbeck, R. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Quisenberry, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Dilbeck, R. E.

Stormproof Boll in Upland Cotton III. Genotype-Environment Interaction and Genetic Analysis1

J. E. Quisenberry and R. E. Dilbeck2

Stormproofness (lock tenacity) of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) was defined as the amount of force required to extract a locule of seedcotton from the bur of a mature boll. Six entries representing the range of variability in stormproofness of Upland cotton were grown in seven environments to study the relationship of the character to temperature and precipitation. In a separate experiment, a complete diallel set of crosses among the six entries was grown for 2 years to estimate general (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) associated with the inheritance of the stormproof trait.

In general, stormproofness increased as temperature during the boll maturation period decreased or seasonal precipitation increased. Temperature appeared to influence stormproofness more than precipitation, although responses among the entries varied. ‘Acala 1517 BR-2,’ TM-1, Contextum, and ‘Macha’ were more responsive to temperature than to precipitation. Unique Stormproof was about equally influenced by both variables, and ‘Lankart Sel. 57’ was most responsive to precipitation. Results from the genetic study revealed that significant GCA and SCA effects were associated with the expression of stormproofness, but that the SCA effects were small and hybrids tended to be intermediate between their respective parents. The GCA effects interacted with years primarily as a result of relative changes in lock tenacity between the stormproof and nonstormproof cultivars. A relationship between lock tenacity and the percentage of storm loss (seedcotton that fell on the ground) showed that hybrids between non stormproof cultivars may suffer relatively high storm losses.

Key Words: Gossypium hirsutum L. • Seedcotton tenacity • Diallel analysis • Storm loss • Lock tenacity


1 Contribution from the AR, SEA, USDA, in cooperation with the Texas Agric. Exp. Stn.

2 Research geneticist and research technician, respectively, AR, SEA, USDA, Route 3, Lubbock, TX 79401.

Received for publication February 19, 1980.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1981 by the Crop Science Society of America.