Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 21:392-397 (1981)
© 1981 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rowe, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hill, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rowe, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hill, R. R., Jr.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rowe, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hill, R. R.

Inter-population Improvement Procedures for Alfalfa1

D. E. Rowe and R. R. Hill, Jr.2

We compared methods of improving a synthetic cultivar with parentage that traced to two different populations. Theoretical equations that expressed changes in the mean of a twd-population synthetic were developed for three methods of selection: (1) selection within each population followed by combination of the selected individuals into a synthetic (CS); (2) selection based on top-crossing each population to a common tester and combining the selected individuals (TX); and (3) reciprocal recurrent selection (RRS) in which each population served as the tester parent for the other. Theoretical responses were compared for additive, dominant, duplex dominant, and overdominant genetic models in a two-allele, single locus autotetraploid population. Two pairs of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) populations were compared experimentally to test the effectiveness of polycross and topcross selection for resistance to Colletotrichum trifolii Bain, an index of resistance to C. trifolii and regrowth after cutting, and an index of these two traits plus resistance to Leptosphaerulina briosiana (Poll.) Graham and Luttrell.

Each of the selection methods had the same theoretical response with the additive genetic model. The efficiency of TX relative to CS and RRS varied with gene frequency combinations for all nonadditive genetic models. With complete dominance a tester parent existed for which TX selection would be at least as effective as CS or RRS, although differences were small for some gene frequency combinations. Response with TX selection was greater with complete dominance when the tester parent was inferior to the base population. Generalizations could not be made about relative effectiveness of the methods for the duplex dominance model. Negative responses to selection for a trait with overdominance could occur at some gene frequency combinations with CS and TX selection, but response was never negative with RRS.

Experimentally, topeross selection was more effective than polycross selection for resistance to C. trifolii when the tester parent had less resistance than the base population, and topeross selection was less effective when the tester parent was more resistant. Comparisons could not be made for the two-character index selection, but good agreement with theoretical expectations was observed with the three-character index.

Key Words: Reciprocal recurrent selection • Topcross selection • Medicago sativa L. • Progeny test selection


1 Joint contribution of the Pennsylvania State Univ. and the USDASEA-AR. Authorized for publication as Journal Series No. 5993 by the Pennsylvania Agric. Exp. Stn. University Park, PA 16802. Contribution No. 8005 of the U.S. Regional Pasture Research Laboratory, USDA-SEA-AR, University Park, PA 16802.

2 Formerly graduate research assistant (now research geneticist. Tobacco Resarch Laboaratory. Route 2, Box 16G. Oxford, NC 27565), and research agronomist, U.S. Regional Pasture Research Laboratory. University Park, PA 16802, respectively.

Received for publication September 19, 1980.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
A. R. Hallauer
History, Contribution, and Future of Quantitative Genetics in Plant Breeding: Lessons From Maize
Crop Sci., December 18, 2007; 47(Supplement_3): S-4 - S-19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1981 by the Crop Science Society of America.