Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 21:259-262 (1981)
© 1981 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fehr, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fehr, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, T. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fehr, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, T. A.

Critical Stages of Development for Defoliation of Soybean1

W. R. Fehr, B. K. Lawrence and T. A. Thompson2

One objective of our research was to define the most critical stages for defoliation of indeterminate and determinate soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] strains. The second objective was to determine if yield loss from defoliation at R4.5 could be predicted by the average of loss at R4 and R5 and if loss at R5.5 could be predicted by the average of loss at R5 and R6. Response to 100% defoliation for an indeterminate cultivar, ‘Beeson,’ and a determinate experimental strain, A72-407R, was evaluated at Ames, Iowa during 3 years. The strains were defoliated at R4 (full pod), R4.5, R5 (beginning seed), R5.5, and R6 (full seed).

The indeterminate strain had an average yield loss across stages of 59% compared with 80% for the determinate strain, but the strain x stage interaction was not significant. The most critical stage for defoliation varied among environments, but was either R5 or R5.5 for both strains. The average yield loss at R4.5 of 72% was slightly greater than the average of loss at R4 and R5 of 68%. The average yield loss at R5.5 of 80% was significantly greater than the average of loss at R5 and R6 of 69%. Yield response to defoliation at R4.5 and R5.5 should be considered in estimating yield reduction from factors that cause defoliation of soybeans.

Key Words: Glycine max (L.) Merr. • Leaf removal • Yield • Yield components • Leaf area • Stages of development • Determinate • Indeterminate • Integrated pest management • Economic-injury level


1 Journal Paper No. J-9791 of the Iowa Agric. Home Econ. Exp. Stn., Ames, Iowa, Project No. 2118. The research was supported in part by the National Crop Insurance Assoc. and the Crop Insurance Research Bureau.

2 Professor, research associate, and former graduate teaching assistant (presently manager, Thompson Farms, Leland, IA 50453), Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011.

Received for publication March 31, 1980.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1981 by the Crop Science Society of America.