Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 21:28-30 (1981)
© 1981 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benedict, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Wynholds, P. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Benedict, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Wynholds, P. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Benedict, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Wynholds, P. F.

Nectariless Cotton: Effect on Growth, Survival, and Fecundity of Lygus Bugs1

John H. Benedict, Thomas F. Leigh, Angus H. Hyer and Paul F. Wynholds2

Experiments were conducted in the laboratory, greenhouse, and field to evaluate the effect of the nectariless character in cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L., on growth, survival, oviposition rate, and population increase of lygus hugs, Lygus hesperus Knight. Survival of L. hesperus nymphs on Stoneville 7A nectariless was 16% lower than on ‘Stoneville 7A’ during a 7-day growth period. Reduction on other nectariless lines was not as great. Survival of female L. hesperus, confined for 14 days on a nectariless cotton, was 6% less and the number of nymphs emerging was 12% less than on the nectaried commercial standard, ‘Acala SJ-I.’ Growth rates of lygus populations, during two generations in field cages, were reduced 34% by the nectariless character in Acala H4016 nectariless and 40% on Stoneville 7A nectariless when compared to their nearisogenic nectaried commercial standards. Populations of lygus bugs on Deltapine 16 nectariless were not lower, however, than on its nectaried near-isoline. Thus, the response of the insect was affected not only by the nectariless character but also by the genetic backgrounds of the cultivars and lines tested.

Key Words: Host-plant resistance • Gossypium hirsutum L. • Antibiosis • Lygus hesperus Knight


1 Contribution of the Dep. of Entomology, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616, and U.S. Cotton Res. Stn., AR, SEA, USDA, Shafter, CA 93263.

2 Assistant professor, Texas A&M Univ., Agric. Exp. Stn., P.O. Box 10607, Corpus Christi, TX 78410; professor, Dep. of Entomology, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616; research agronomist, AR, SEA, USDA, U.S. Cotton Res. Stn., Shafter, CA 93263; and staff research associate, Dep. of Entomology, Univ. of California, Davis CA 95616, respectively.

Received for publication May 12, 1980.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1981 by the Crop Science Society of America.