Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 20:751-755 (1980)
© 1980 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bello, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bello, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, L. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bello, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, L. C.

Influence of Cultivar, Between-row Spacing, and Plant Population of Fixation of Soybean1

A. B. Bello, W. A. Ceron-Diaz, C. D. Nickell, E. O. El Sherif and L. C. Davis2

An evaluation of the seasonal trends in nitrogen fixation by three soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] cultivars differing in growth habits was made at two locations in Kansas. Two planting dates—May and June; two row spacings—38 cm and 76 cm—and two plant populations— 380,000 and 760,000 plants/ha were examined. Root samples were assayed weekly for acetylene reduction commencing from 3 weeks after planting until physiological maturity. The trends in N2-fixation (acetylene reduction) for May and June plantings at both locations were similar for all cultivars, although more N2 was fixed at the location where the soil was sandy and low in available soil N. There was a linear relationship between N accumulation and N2-fixation. After pod filling Wiliiams (indeterminate) fixed more N2 than the other cultivars. Elf (determinate) was consistently low in N2-fixation ability throughout the sampling period. There was a significant positive response in Nrfixation to higher plant population at both locations. However, the effect of plant population was not evident in increasing total plant N uptake, seed N, or seed yield. The eariy planting date favored N2-fixation by allowing a longer period of active fixation but showed no advantage in seed yield or total N accumulation.

Key Words: Nitrogen accumulation • Irrigation • Acetylene reduction


1 Contribution No. 80-125-J, Agronomy Dep. and Biochemistry Dep., Kansas Agric. Exp. Stn., Manhattan, KS 66506. Supported by Kansas Agric. Exp. Stn. and NSF grant PCM-760397

2 2 National Cereal Res. Inst. Moor Plantation, Ibadan, Nigeria (formerly graduate student): graduate student; associate professor of plant breeding, Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, (formerly soybean geneticist): graduate student; and assistant professor of Biochemistry.

Received for publication November 14, 1979.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
S. A. Ennin and M. D. Clegg
Effect of Soybean Plant Populations in a Soybean and Maize Rotation
Agron. J., March 1, 2001; 93(2): 396 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1980 by the Crop Science Society of America.