Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 20:703-706 (1980)
© 1980 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Roath, W. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Roath, W. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Roath, W. W.

Comparison of Inbred vs. Single-cross Testers and Estimation of Genetic Effects in Sunflower1

J. F. Miller, J. J. Hammond and W. W. Roath2

The objectives of this study were to determine relative effectiveness of inbred versus single-cross testers in identifying combining ability of inbred sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) lines; to determine whether epistasis was significant in the genetic systems controlling selected traits; and to evaluate the importance of additive and dominance variance for traits not influenced by epistasis. The hybrids evaluated in this study were formed by crossing the inbred lines RHA 274 and RHA 278, and their single-cross, RHA 274/RHA 278, to 10 randomly selected female inbred lines. The design used was a variation of the triple testcross, an extension of the Experiment III design.

The interaction of female x restorer parent was significant, indicating that the three testers did not rank the female lines identically for yield. However, the three testers did identify three of the top four lines when a 40% selection criterion was applied. For oil percentage, the interaction of female x male parents was nonsignificant indicating that the three testers gave very similar rankings. Utilizing any one of the three testers will differentiate or identify high-yielding potential female lines for yield and oil percentage in a population improvement or inbred development program.

Epistasis was a minor factor in the overall genetic variation for all traits studied in these sunflower lines. Additive variances were most important, with dominance variances important only for yield. The estimate for degree of dominance for yield (0.62) indicated that partial dominance predominated, an observation with significant implications for breeders in countries that primarily use open-pollinated cultivars. Improvement by development of high-yielding synthetics or open-pollinated cultivars should be continued. The results also indicate that breeders should develop population improvement schemes that utilize the large additive portion of genetic variance detected in this study.

Key Words: Helianthus annuus L. • Sunflower breeding • Genetic effects


1 Joint contribution from USDA-SEA, AR and the Agric. Exp. Stn., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105. Contribution No. 1062.

2 Research geneticist, USDA-SEA-AR; professor, Dep. of Agronomy; and research geneticist, USDA-SEA, AR, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105.

Received for publication April 21, 1980.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
A.J. Leon, F.H. Andrade, and M. Lee
Genetic Mapping of Factors Affecting Quantitative Variation for Flowering in Sunflower
Crop Sci., March 1, 2000; 40(2): 404 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
M. T. Cheres, J. F. Miller, and S. J. Knapp
Donor Inbred Lines for Enhancing the Performance of Single-Cross Sunflower Hybrids
Crop Sci., September 1, 1999; 39(5): 1325 - 1331.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1980 by the Crop Science Society of America.