Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 20:655-659 (1980)
© 1980 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuhn, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Shaner, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kuhn, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Shaner, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kuhn, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Shaner, G.

Inheritance of Slow Leaf-rusting Resistance in Suwon 85 Wheat1

Roger C. Kuhn, H. W. Ohm and G. Shaner2

The inheritance of slow leaf-rusting resistance of the wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell) cultivar ‘Suwon 85’ was studied in crosses with susceptible cultivars ‘Monon’ and ‘Suwon 92.’ Plants were grown in the greenhouse and inoculated with Puccinia recondita Rob. ex Desm. f. sp. tritici. Two components of slow leaf-rusting resistance, latent period and pustule size, were measured. The distribution of Suwon 85/Suwon 92 F3 family mean latent period indicated partial dominance for short latent period, but gave little evidence of distinct classes. A model that assumed two genes with equal effect and an equal degree of dominance (0.6) for shorter latent period was constructed from earlier data. F3 families were classified into F2 genotypes based on the family mean, range and apparent segregation. The resulting classification gave an acceptable fit to the two gene model. Thus, a lack of distinct classes in an F2 distribution should not be interpreted as proof of polygenic inheritance. Pustule size was correlated with latent period in the F3 (r = –0.55 to –0.63) but there were genetic differences between F3 families for pustule size even after adjustment for latent period differences. F1 and BCF latent period data from the cross Suwon 85/Monon appeared to fit the two gene model described above, but population size was too small to adequately confirm this model.

Key Words: Triticum aestivum L. • Disease resistance • General resistance • Durable resistance • Epidemiology • Resistance breeding


1 Contribution from Purdue Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn., W. Lafayette, IN 47907. Part of a thesis submitted by the senior author in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree at Purdue Univ. Journal Paper No. 7810.

2 Post-Doctorate, Agronomy Dep., Ohio State Univ.; Associate professor, agronomy, Purdue Univ.; and associate professor of botany and plant pathology, Purdue Univ., respectively.

Received for publication November 5, 1979.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1980 by the Crop Science Society of America.