Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 20:545-548 (1980)
© 1980 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shaver, T. N.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, F. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shaver, T. N.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, F. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Shaver, T. N.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, F. D.

Use of Glandless Breeding Stocks to Evaluate Unknown Heliothis Growth Inhibitors (X-Factors) in Cotton1

T. N. Shaver, R. H. Dilday and F. D. Wilson2

A significant linear relationship (r = 0.86 to 0.90) was found between reduction in larval weight of tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens (F•), and flowerbud gossypol content of 1) F2 progenies of Upland stocks crossed with three Texas race stocks (Texas 216, Texas 490, and Texas 1134) of cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L., and 2) 221 entries from the race stock collection. Most of the suppression of growth of larvae which fed on diets containing extracts of progenies from the three race stocks could be attributed to gossypol or to other compounds that occur in pigment glands and can be measured by the colorimetric method for gossypol involving reaction with aniline. Subsequently, 317 glandless progenies from glandless strains crossed with derivatives of Texas 27, Texas 194 and Texas 254 were assayed for their effect on larval growth. None of the glandless selections tested caused a reduction in larval growth compared with insects feeding on a casein-wheat germ diet, which suggest that the X-factor effect results from one of the following: 1) gossypol; 2) synergist or additive effects of gossypol and other toxic compounds in flowerbuds; 3) gossypol-related compound that gives the same colorimetric test as gossypol but is more toxic than gossypol. Some of the glanded sister lines from the crosses suppressed larval weight by more than 50%, but generally this reduction was within the confidence limits of the reduction expected fxom gossypol content.

Key Words: Gossypium hirsutum L. • Host plant resistance • Gossypol • Pigment glands • Heliothis virescens (F.)


1 Cooperative investigation of the AR-SEA-USDA, and the Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843.

2 Research chemist, AR-SEA-USDA, College Station, TX 77840; research geneticist, AR-SEA-USDA, Brownsville, TX 78520; and research geneticist, AR-SEA-USDA, Phoenix, AZ 85040, respectively.

Received for publication January 7, 1980.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1980 by the Crop Science Society of America.