Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 20:479-483 (1980)
© 1980 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Townsend, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Townsend, C. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Townsend, C. E.

Flowering Characteristics of Cicer Milkvetch Clones and Their Polycross Progenies1

C. E. Townsend2

The flowering requirements of cicer milkvetch (Astragalus cicer L.) are not known. Many plants do not flower in a greenhouse environment or during the seedling year in the field. The primary objective of this study was to determine the relationship between the flowering characteristles of 34 parental clones in the greenhouse and field and the performance of their polycress progenies for similar characters in the field. All clones flowered during the first growth period in the greenhouse when brought from the field in late December. However, flowering did not occur on the regrowth of some clones in the greenhouse. Date of flowermg in the field during the year of establishment was more highly correlated to date of flowering on the regrowth(r = 0.68) than on the first growth (r = –0.12) of these clones in the greenhouse. After going through the winter in the field, all clones flowered profusely the following spring.

In the field during the seedling year the percent of nonflowering plants within polycross progenies ranged from 2 to 51. After going through the winter in the field, all plants in 13 of 34 progenies flowered the following spring; only 3.5% of the total population did not flower. On the regrowth in the second year the percent of nonflowering, plants within progenies ranged, from 4 to 40, which was similar to that in the seedling year. Percentage of nonflowering plants was significantly correlated with date of flowering during all three growth periods. In the field, date of flowering for the parental clones during the year of establishment was significantly correlated with date of flowering of their polycross progenies in the seedling year (r=0.61). Both the greenhouse and field data indicated that some genotypes did not require exposure to low temperature for flower induction whereas other genotypes did. The low temperature requirements for such genotypes remain to be determined.

Key Words: Astragalus cicer L. • Thermal-induction • Low temperature


1 Contribution of the AR, SEA, USDA, in cooperation with the Colorado State Univ. Exp. Stn., Scientific Series No. 2500.

2 Research geneticist, AR, SEA, USDA, Crops Res. Lab., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523.

Received for publication November 19, 1979.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1980 by the Crop Science Society of America.