Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 20:421-426 (1980)
© 1980 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karami, E.
Right arrow Articles by Quisenberry, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Karami, E.
Right arrow Articles by Quisenberry, J. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Karami, E.
Right arrow Articles by Quisenberry, J. E.

Water Relations and Carbon-14 Assimilation of Cotton with Different Leaf Morphology1

E. Karami, D. R. Krieg and J. E. Quisenberry2

The purpose of this research was to determine the usefulness of simply inherited genetic differences in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) leaf morphology (normal, laciniate, and superokra) as it relates to drought tolerance or water use efficiency. This initial report describes the leaf water potential components, C02 fixation rates, and the rate of loss of assimilated 14C from various source leaves on plants subjected to soil water stress at select growth stages under glasshouse conditions.

No significant genotypic differences were observed in leaf water potential components or in CO2 fixation rates when the soil water content was near field capacity. Trends did exist for the superokra to be slightly superior to the normaleaf type. Significant differences were observed in both the rate and extent of 14C loss from different source leaves in the various genotypes. The superokra genotype had the highest activity, whereas the normal leaf genotype was the lowest in activity.

As soil water availability began to affect leaf water status, significant genotypic differences existed in all measured physiological parameters. The superokra genotype was able to maintain a more favorable leaf water status through a combination of higher leaf water potential and lower osmotic potentlal than the normal leaf genotypes. Photosynthetic rates were reduced by water stress in all genotypes; however, the magnitude of the reduction varied significantly among the genotypes reflecting specific differences in turgor pressure. The removal of assimilated 14C from various source leaves subjected to water stress also exhibited significant genotypic differences both in the rate of removal and in the total amount of assimilate removed during a 24-hour period. As water stress intensified the photosynthetic assimilation of 14CO2 was found to be more sensitive than the removal of assimilate from the source leaf.

The results of these experiments indicate a possible advantage of altered leaf morphology when cotton leaves are subjected to soil water stress. The benefits of improved water relations and CO2 assimilatlon to yield in the altered leaf types of cotton remain to be evaluated.

Key Words: Gossypium hirsutum L. • Normal • Laciniate • Superokra • Leaf water potential • Osmotic potential • Turgor potential


1 Joint contribution from the Plant and Soil Science Dep., Texas Tech Univ., The Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. and the USDA/SEA-AR.

2 Associate professor, Dep. of Agronomy, Shiraz Univ., Shiraz, Iran (This research was conducted while on sabbatical leave at Texas Tech Univ.); professor, Plant and SOil Science Dep., Texas Tech Univ.; Lubbock, TX 79409; and Research geneticist USDA-SEA, Rt. 3, Lubbock, TX 79401.

Received for publication May 21, 1979.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
W. T. Pettigrew
Physiological Consequences of Moisture Deficit Stress in Cotton
Crop Sci., July 1, 2004; 44(4): 1265 - 1272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
W. T. Pettigrew
Moisture Deficit Effects on Cotton Lint Yield, Yield Components, and Boll Distribution
Agron. J., March 1, 2004; 96(2): 377 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
W. T. Pettigrew and M. A. Jones
Cotton Growth under No-Till Production in the Lower Mississippi River Valley Alluvial Flood Plain
Agron. J., November 1, 2001; 93(6): 1398 - 1404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1980 by the Crop Science Society of America.