Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 20:370-374 (1980)
© 1980 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, E. F.
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, H. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Young, E. F., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, H. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Young, E. F.
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, H. D.

Day-degree Units and Time in Relation to Vegetative Development and Fruiting for Three Cultivars of Cotton1

E. F. Young, Jr., R. M. Taylor and H. D. Petersen2

In a test of two Upland cotton (Gossypium hlrsutum L.) cultivars and one Pima (G. barbadmme L.) cultivar Planted on five dates, fewer days were required to produce first true leaf, square, and flower stages as the date of planting was advanced from 1 April to 27 May. Days from planting required to produce open bolls decreased as planting temperatures approached an optimum, then increased for the last planting date. Differences among planting dates for cumulative day-degree units needed to produce flowers and true leaves were non-significant, whereas those needed to produce the square and open boll stages were significant. The boll period increased with delay of the flower and harvest stages as the season progressed. The numbers of day-degree units and heat units were negatively correlated with the length of the boll period. The number of day-degree units gave a better estimate of boll period by harvest week than the number of heat units. Boll period was influenced more by reductions in day-degree units in ‘Pima S-4’ than in the two Upland cultivars.

Key Words: Boll period • Heat units • Fruiting response • Vegetative growth • Planting date • Gossypium hirsutum L. • Gossypium barbadense L.


1 Contribution from the USDA-SEA-AR and the Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., College Station, TX 77843 (Technical article No. 15188). Research supported in part by the Supima Association of America.

2 Research agronomist, USDA-SEA-AR, 4207 E. Broadway, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (formerly 1380 A&M Circle, El Paso, TX 79927); associate professor, Texas A&M Res. Center, 1380 A&M Circle, E1 Paso, TX 79927; and mathematical statistician, USDASEA-AR, Box EC, College Station, TX 77840.

Received for publication October 26, 1979.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
C. J. Fernandez and T. N. Trolinger
Development of a Web-Based Decision Support System For Crop Managers: Structural Considerations and Implementation Case
Agron. J., April 4, 2007; 99(3): 730 - 737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1980 by the Crop Science Society of America.