Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published in Crop Sci 20:10-14 (1980)
© 1980 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ackerson, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Sung, F. J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ackerson, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Sung, F. J. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ackerson, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Sung, F. J. M.

Leaf Conductance and Osmoregulation of Field-grown Sorghum Genotypes1

R. C. Ackerson, D. R. Krieg and F. J. M. Sung2

The relationship between stomatal activity and leaf water potential components was examined for several sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] genotypes as function of growth stage under semi-arid field conditions. During vegetative development, prior to flowering, genotypic differences were observed in the leaf water potential required to initiate stomatal control of transpirational water loss and the rate of change in conductance per unit change in leaf water potential. No significant genotypic differences existed in conductance when leaf water potential was high. After flowering and attainment of maximum leaf size, conductance remained high even when the leaf water potentials declined to –24 to –26 bars.

The relationships between leaf water potential components were examined to help explain the leaf conductance observations. Genotypic differences were observed in the leaf water potential-leaf turgor potential relationships at each growth stage. Prior to flowering, as leaf water potential declined, leaf turgor declined accordingly with little evidence of osmoregulation, and all genotypes reached calculated 0 turgor at essentially the same leaf water potential (–18 to –20 bars). Genotypic differences were also observed in the leaf turgor-stomatal conductance relationships.

After flowering, during the grain filling stage, significant genotypic differences were observed in the degree of osmotic adjustment. The genetic range in osmotic adjustment represents a potentially important adaptive mechanism to water stress which allows for maintenance of turgor and thus of metabolic functions dependent on turgor. Apparently, water conservation through stomatal control is practiced to some extent in sorghum prior to the onset of reproductive development; however, after flowering photosynthetic productivity is apparently maintained at the expense of water conservation.

Key Words: Water use efficiency • Stomatal resistance • Water stress • Growth stage

1 Contribution from the Dep. of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech Univ. and the Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Lubbock, TX 79049.

2 Former graduate research associate (currently research physiologist, Central Res. & Dev. Dep. Experimental Station, E. I. duPont de Nemours and Co. Wilmington, DE 19898); professor; former graduate research assistant (currently assistant professor, Res. Inst. of Food Crops, Dep. of Agronomy National Chung-Hsing Univ., Taichung, Taiwan).

Received for publication January 8, 1979.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1980 by the Crop Science Society of America.