Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 19:783-785 (1979)
© 1979 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yazdi-Samadi, B.
Right arrow Articles by Zali, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Yazdi-Samadi, B.
Right arrow Articles by Zali, A. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Yazdi-Samadi, B.
Right arrow Articles by Zali, A. A.

Comparison of Winter- and Spring-Type Safflower1

Bahman Yazdi-Samadi and A. A. Zali2

Winter and spring types of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) were compared in three tests. Two separate tests, one of 26 winter-type lines and the other of 25 winter-type lines, each compared winter types with five spring-type cultivars developed in Iran. Both tests were sown in the fall and in the spring in the 1973–74 season. A third test, which included selected materials from the first two tests, was sown in October, April, and May of the 1974–75 season. A two-replicate split-plot design was used for each test, with planting dates the main plots, and lines and cultivars as subplots.

The tests showed that, on the average, winter types survived better and yielded more seed and oil than did spring types in fall plantings during 1973–74, when the minimum temperature recorded during the growing season was —14.4C, but in 1974–75, when the minimum temperature recorded during the growing season was —7.6C, yield and survival were similar. Winter types flowered about the same time as spring types when both were sown in the fall, but were about 3 weeks later than spring types when sown in the spring; winter types were taller than spring types; yields of seed/ha were higher for whiter types than for spring types in fall plantings in 1973–74, but not in 1974–75; and winter types were distinctly inferior to spring types in spring plantings. Fall-planted winter type safflower yielded more than spring-planted safflower and exceeded fall-planted, spring-type safflower in yield during the cold (—14.4 C) winter.

Key Words: Carthamus tinctorius L. • Safflower cold tolerance


1 Contribution from the Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.

2 Associate professors, Univ. of Tehran.

Received for publication September 25, 1978.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Plant RegistrationsHome page
R. C. Johnson and D. Li
Registration of WSRC01, WSRC02, and WSRC03 Winter-Hardy Safflower Germplasm
Journal of Plant Registrations, May 1, 2008; 2(2): 140 - 142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1979 by the Crop Science Society of America.