Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 18:69-73 (1978)
© 1978 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brinkman, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Frey, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brinkman, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Frey, K. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Brinkman, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Frey, K. J.

Flag Leaf Physiological Analysis of Oat Isolines That Differ in Grain Yield from Their Recurrent Parents1

M. A. Brinkman and K. J. Frey2

An early and a midseason series of oat (Avena sativa L.) isolines were developed for resistance to crown rust Puccinia coronata Cda var. avenae Frazier and Ledingham), but they were significantly higher or lower yielding than their recurrent parent in each series. The purpose of this study was to determineif the isolines in each series had significant differences in physiological characteristics of flag leaves from their respective recurrent parent that may have contributed to the deviant grain yields.

Plants were grown in field plots and CO2 exchange rates (CER) and transpiration (T) were measured on intact leaves. In the early series, the two high yielding isolines had higher CER, and in the midseason series the low yielding isoline had a lower CER than the respective recurrent parent. Rates of T and specific leaf weights (SLW) were similar to the recurrent parent T and SLW in each series.

Differences in CER between isolines and their recurrent parent were attributable primarily to differences in residual (mesophyll) resistance (rr) to CO2 diffusion in both series. There was no association between CER and SLW within the two sets of closely related lines.

Key Words: Avena sativa L. • Photosynthesis • Transpiration • Specific leaf weight • Resistance to C02 diffusion • Yield components • Leaf area duration


1 Journal Paper No. J-8539 of the Iowa Agric. Home Econ. Exp. Stn., Ames, Iowa. Project No. 1752. Submitted by the senior author in partial fulfilhnent of the requirements of the Ph,D.degree.

2 Former NDEA Fellow (now assistant professor of agronomy, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706) and Curtiss Distinguished Professor of Agriculture, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011.

Received for publication November 2, 1976.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1978 by the Crop Science Society of America.