Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 18:115-118 (1978)
© 1978 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thakare, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Qualset, C. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Thakare, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Qualset, C. O.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Thakare, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Qualset, C. O.

Empirical Evaluation of Single-Plant and Family Selection Strategies in Wheat1

R. B. Thakare and C. O. Qualset2

Random F3 families from the cross of two high-yielding short-statured spring wheats (Triticum aestivum L.) ‘Anza’ and ‘Bluebird-2’ were space-planted in two blocks in a field planting. From each F3 family, two to five of the best appearing plants from one block and five random plants in the second block were selected to study four selection strategies. Grain yields of the F3 plants were obtained and 36 random families, each having three random and two visually selected lines, were studied in the F4 in field trials at two locations using the commercial seeding rate. The F3 selection strategies and F4 yield results, given as percentages over the random F4 mean yield for the random and visually selected progenies, respectively, were as follows: (1) individual selection, 0.33 selection intensity, 4.21 and 4.73%; (2) within family selection, best plant in each family selected, 2.43 and 2.87%; (3) family selection, 0.33 selection intensity, 1.01 and 5.52%; and (4) combined family and within family selection, 0.33 selection intensity for families with the best plant selected within families, 3.56 and 7.57%. Three-stage selection using (1) visual selection of plants, (2) selection of families on the basis of the mean of yields of visually selected plants, and (3) selection of best plants within selected families appears to be an effective and easily applied strategy worthy of further evaluation.

Key Words: Triticum aestivum L. • Selection response • Visual selection • Breeding methods


1 Contribution from the Dep. of Agronomy and Range Science, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616.

2 Former graduate student (present address: International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, P.M.B. 5320, Ibadan, Nigeria) and professor of agronomy.

Received for publication March 21, 1977.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1978 by the Crop Science Society of America.