Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 17:851-853 (1977)
© 1977 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Perlinger, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Perlinger, G. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Perlinger, G. J.

Inheritance of Shattering in Wild Rice1

W. A. Elliott and G. J. Perlinger2

Wild rice (Zizania aquatica L.) is a native annual aquatic cereal that grows in lakes and streams in the upper great lakes region of North America. Native ecotypes shed staminate florets shortly after anthesis and grain shatters over a 2 to 3 week maturation period. A mutant was found which retains its staminate florets beyond anthesis and has a moderate degree of resistance to seed shattering. Objectives of this study were to determine the mode of inheritance of shattering resistance and to determine the relationship between staminate floret retention and resistance to seed shattering.

Crosses were made between five shattering susceptible plants and five shattering resistant plants. The resulting S1, F1, and F2 progenies were studied. Two complementary dominant genes were proposed to explain the observed segregations. Susceptibility to shattering occurred when at least one dominate allele (Sh– Sh2–) was present at both loci. Shattering resistant genotypes were: sh sh sh2 sh2, sh sh Sh2–, and Sh– sh2 sh2. All F2 plants which retained 100% of their staminate florets at the completion of anthesis were classed as resistant, while all those which lost all of their staminate florets were classed as susceptible. Other plants were observed that retained some staminate florets. Some of these plants were susceptible and some were resistant to shattering. The selection of shattering resistant plants at anthesis can be accomplished by selecting plants having 100% staminate floret retention.

Key Words: Staminate floret retention • Wild rice ecotypes


1 Contribution of the Dep. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics. Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108. Paper No. 9903 Scientific Journal Series, Minnesota Agric. Exp. Stn

2 Assistant professor, and former graduate research assistant (now General Foods Agronomist, Waseca, MN 56093, respectively, in Agronomy and Plant Genetics, Univ. of Minnesota. St. Panl, MN 55108.

Received for publication May 2, 1977.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1977 by the Crop Science Society of America.