Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 17:735-740 (1977)
© 1977 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Davies, W. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Davies, W. J.

Stomatal Responses to Water Stress and Light in Plants Grown in Controlled Environments and in the Field1

W. J. Davies2

Experiments were performed to investigate the water relations of plants grown in controlled environments and in the field. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum cv. ‘McNair 511’) and soybeans (Glycine max cv. ‘Ransom’), were grown from seed in pots in a phytotron growth chamber, an air-conditioned greenhouse, and in a field plot. All plants were well-watered but minimum midday water potentials were lower in field-grown plants than in chamber- or greenhouse-grown plants, and lower in cotton than in soybean. Predawn- (in the field and greenhouse) and "before lights on-" (in the chamber) water potential ({psi}) levels were consistently lower in cotton than in soybean. In both soybean and cotton, adaxial stomata were more sensitive than abaxial stomata to decreasing leaf water potential. Stomatal sensitivity to decreasing leaf water potential and leaf water content (RWC) was related follows: Chamber-grown plants> greenhouse-grown> plants> field-grown plants. There were differences in the {psi}/RWC relationships of the two species and in soybeaus, the {psi}/RWC relationship differed between chamber- and field-grown plants. Adaxial stomata of both species were considerably more sensitive to low light intensity than were abaxial stomata. In soybeans, both abaxial and adaxial stomata of chamber-grown plants were more sensitive to low light intensity than were respective abaxial and adaxial stomata of greenhouse- or field-grown plants. In cotton, stomata of chamber- and greenhousegrown plants behaved similarly and were considerably more sensitive to low light intensity than were stomata of field-grown plants. The effect of plant growth conditions may not be uniform for all species. Considerable care should be exercised in making comparisons among species or varieties grown in the field or in different types of controlled environments.

Key Words: Cotton • Soybean • Water potential • Relative water content • Gossypium hirsutumGlycine max


1 Contribution from the Dep. of Botany, Duke Univ., Durham, NC 27706.

2 Research associate, Dep. of Botany, Duke Univ., present address: Dep. of Biological Sciences, Univ, of Lancaster, Lancaster, LAI 4YQ, Lancs., England.

Received for publication July 26, 1976.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1977 by the Crop Science Society of America.