Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 17:689-694 (1977)
© 1977 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hooker, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hooker, A. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hooker, A. L.

A Plant Pathologist's View of Germplasm Evaluation and Utilization1

A. L. Hooker2

Plant diseases represent important preventable hazards to crop production. Genetic or cytoplasmic uniformity greatly increases vulnerability to disease when the crop is a) widely grown, b) has resistance to an aggressive pathogen that has an efficient means of dispersal and the potential for frequent genetic shifts from avirulence to virulence, and c) is grown in an environment favorable for disease. While there are risks to crop uniformity, the advantages to agriculture outweigh the disadvantages. Since epidemics are rare, present germplasm evaluation and utilization schemes are quite good but improvements are possible. Better monitoring of pathogens and germplasm relative to genes and cytoplasms for resistance is needed. Many germplasm collections have not been adequately evaluated for disease reaction and the available genes for resistance have not been transferred to plant types suitable for agriculture. Stable resistance to most diseases can be achieved by means of breeding and gene deployment. General resistance, multicomponent resistance, zonal deployment, and multilines are alternatives, each with advantages and limitation relative to plant breeding and agricultural objectives. International testing against a diversity of pathogen biotypes in a range of environments is a powerful tool in breeding for disease resistance. Germplasm diversity affords some protection against the unknown.

Key Words: Disease resistance • Genetic vulnerability • Monitoring • Plant breeding


1 Contribution from Illinois Agric. Exp. Stn., Urbana, IL 61801. Presented at Symposium on Genetic Vulnerability, Germplasm, Resources, and Plant Breeding Strategies, 1975 annual meeting Crop Sci. Soc. of Am., Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville.

2 Professor of plant pathology and plant genetics, Deps. of Plant Pathology and Agronomy, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana.

Received for publication May 22, 1976.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
W. Brill
Safety concerns and genetic engineering in agriculture
Science, January 25, 1985; 227(4685): 381 - 384.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1977 by the Crop Science Society of America.