Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 17:507-510 (1977)
© 1977 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R. W.

Psychrometric Analysis of Turgor Pressure Response: A Possible Technique for Evaluating Plant Water Strees Resistance1

Douglas A. Johnson and Ray W. Brown2

Turgor pressure responses were determined over a range of water stress for Zea mays L., Bromus inermis Leyss., and the following colchicine-induced Agropyron amphiploid hybrids: A. dasystachyum (Hook.) Scribn. x Acaninum (L.) Beauv., A. spicatum (Pursh) Scribn. & Smith x A. dasystachyum, and A. fibrosum (Schrenk) Nevski x A. trachycaulum (Link) Malte ex H. F. Lewis. These plants were grown in a greenhouse and then allowed to acclimate to a growth chamber for 10 days before turgor pressure was determined. Water potential components of detached leaf samples were measured by a psychrometric technique involving freezing and thawing of the leaf tissue. Water was withheld from the potted plants to determine turgor pressure over a range of water stress levels. Linear regressions of turgor pressure on leaf water potential were statistically significant for all comparisons of regression intercepts. Slope comparisons of Bromus inermis and Zea mays with A. dasystachyum x A. caninum and A. spicatum x A. dasystachyum were also statistically different. Predictions of resistance to water stress based on species ability to maintain positive turgor agreed closely with field observations. The ability of this technique to distinguish differences in turgor response between Agropyron hybrids with a common parent suggests that this technique may be useful for screening plant materials for superior resistance to water stress.

Key Words: Water potential • Pressure potential • Osmotic potential • Matric potential • Agropyron hybrids • Zea mays L. • Bromus inermis Leyss • Drought resistance • Plant selection


1 Cooperative investigations of USDA-ARS, USDA Forest Service, and the Utah Agric. Exp. Stn., Logan, UT 84322 (Journal Paper No. 2108).

2 Plant physiologists, USDA-ARS, Crops Research Lab., Utah State Univ., Logan, UT 84322; and USDA Forest Service, Inter-mountain Forest and Range Exp. Stn., Ogden, Utah, stationed at the Forestry Sciences Lab., Logan, UT 84321.

Received for publication September 30, 1976.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1977 by the Crop Science Society of America.