Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 17:503-506 (1977)
© 1977 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stuber, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Moll, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stuber, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Moll, R. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Stuber, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Moll, R. H.

Genetic Variances and Hybrid Predictions of Maize at Two Plant Densities1

C. W. Stuber2 and R. H. Moll2

Six quantitative traits were compared within and between two plant densities in two sets of maize (Zea mays L.) crosses (one set showing a high proportion and one small proportion of epistatic variance) for: 1) estimates genetic parameters, 2) genotype by environmental interactions, and 3) predictions of hybrid performances. Significance levels for partitions of genetic variation were similar, irrespective of plant density. However, total genetic variance of yield per unit area increased with increased plant density. When the data were transformed to yield per p!ant, genetic variances increased in the set with a high proportion of epistatic variance and decreased in the other set as plant density increased. Differences in epistatic variation may have contributed to this finding. Accurate predictions of hybrid performances within plant densities were highly improbable when a large proportion of epistatic variation was present. Predictions between plant densities were poor for yield and ear number, even with a small proportion of epistatic variation.

Key Words: Quantitative traits • Epistatic variance • Genotype by environmental interaction


1 Paper No. 5047 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina Agric. Exp. Stn., Raleigh, NC 27607.

2 Research geneticist, ARS-USDA, and professor of genetics, North Carolina State Univ.; and professor of genetics, North Carolina State Univ., respectively.

Received for publication September 3, 1976.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1977 by the Crop Science Society of America.