Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 16:667-672 (1976)
© 1976 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Raper, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Raper, C. D., Jr.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Raper, C. D.

Photoperiodic Control of Seed Filling for Soybeans1

Judith F. Thomas and C. David Raper, Jr.2

Soybean plants [Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Ransom’] were grown in the controlled-environment rooms of the phytotron at N.C. State Univ. to investigate the effects on floral and pod development of the morphological stage of plant development upon initial exposure to inductive short days, number of consecutive short days, and temperature. All plants were initially grown under long-day photoperiods and at day/night temperatures of 18/14, 22/18, 26/92, and 30/26 C. In Experiment I, groups of plants were transferred to an inductive short-day photoperiod at three stages of development: expansion of paired primary leaves, unfolding of third trifoliolate leaf, and unfolding of sixth trifoliolate leaf. Plants from each group were returned to the long-day photoperiod upon appearance of the first open flower, when pods were becoming visible, or retained under the short-day photoperiod until termination of the experiment. Measurements of vegetative and reproductive growth were made of all plants at 63 days after planting. In Experiment II, groups of plants were transferred to short-day photoperiods either upon expansion of paired primary leaves or unfolding of sixth trifoliolate leaf. Plants from each group were returned to long-day photoperiods after 0, 10, 15, 95, 30, and 50 consecutive short-days. Measurements of vegetative and reproductive growth were made of all plants, regardless of when returned to long-day photoperiod, at 50 days after initial exposure to short-day photoperiod.

Pod production efficiency (number of pods set/total number of flowers initiated) was greater for plants initially exposed to short days upon expansion of paired primary leaves than for plants exposed at a later morphological stage. However, the numbers of both flowers and pods/plant were increased by delay of exposure to inductive photoperiods due to increased numbers of main stem and axillary branch nodes. As thermoperiod was decreased, maximum pod production efficiency was achieved with fewer consecutive short-days. An increased number of short-day photoperiods beyond that required for efficient pod set was disruptive to vegetative growth. Dry weight of vegetative tissues and area of leaves generally was decreased, and pod weight was increased correspondingly, by increased numbers of consecutive short-days. These data support a conclusion that the rate of seed-fill for soybeans is responsive to photoperiodic conditions.

Key Words: Rate of seed-fill • Pod production efficiency • Temperature • Glycine max (L.) Merr.


1 Paper Number 4956 of the Journal Series of the N. C. Agric. Exp. Stn., Raleigh, N.C. Research reported in this paper was supported in part by NSF (RANN) Grant AEN73-07894 AO1. Operation of the Phytotron unit of Southeastern Plant Environmental Laboratories at N. C. State Univ. was supported in part by NSF Grant GI-28951.

2 Research associate and associate professor, Dep. of Soil Science, N. C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27607.

Received for publication January 15, 1976.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
S. V. Kumudini, P. K. Pallikonda, and C. Steele
Photoperiod and E-genes Influence the Duration of the Reproductive Phase in Soybean
Crop Sci., July 30, 2007; 47(4): 1510 - 1517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
A. G. Kantolic and G. A. Slafer
Development and Seed Number in Indeterminate Soybean as Affected by Timing and Duration of Exposure to Long Photoperiods after Flowering
Ann. Bot., May 1, 2007; 99(5): 925 - 933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
T. Przepiorkowski and S. K. St. Martin
The Effect of Grafting on the Flowering of Near-Isogenic Lines of Soybean
Crop Sci., September 1, 2003; 43(5): 1760 - 1763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
L. Zhang, R. Wang, and J. D. Hesketh
Effects of Photoperiod on Growth and Development of Soybean Floral Bud in Different Maturity
Agron. J., July 1, 2001; 93(4): 944 - 948.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1976 by the Crop Science Society of America.