Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 16:329-333 (1976)
© 1976 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harlan, Jack. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Harlan, Jack. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Harlan, Jack. R.

Genetic Resources in Wild Relatives of Crops1

Jack. R. Harlan2

Currently, the extent of use of wild relatives in breeding programs depends on 1) how wild the crop is, 2) how desperate the situation is, 3) the pressures to turn out new cultivars, 4) the availability of materials, 5) the difficulty of use, and 6) the character of the plant breeder and of the institution in which he works. Wild rdatives have been used as sources of disease, insect, and nematode resistance, to widen adaptation, to provide alternate cytoplasms and develop cytoplasmic sterility systems, to improve quality, alter modes of reproduction, induce short stature, increase crossability between species, improve resistance to stress, and increase yield. Some crops could not mainain commercial status without genetic support of their wild relatives. The principal bottleneck to the use of wild relatives at present is the paucity of materials in our collections. In the future, the need for genetic variability and sources of resistance shall drive us to a much fuller exploitation of all the genetic resources we can assemble.

Key Words: Glycine max (L.) Merr. • Nutrient culture • Ammonium nutrition • Amberlite IRC-50 • Nitrate reductase • Nitrate


1 Contribution from Crop Evolution Lab., Agronomy Dep., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801. Presented at Symposium on Genetic Vulnerability, Germplasm Resources, and Plant Breeding Strategies, Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxvil

2 Professor of plant genetics, Agron. Dep., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana.

Received for publication September 13, 1975.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. S. Bayuelo-Jimenez, D. G. Debouck, and J. P. Lynch
Salinity Tolerance in Phaseolus Species during Early Vegetative Growth
Crop Sci., November 1, 2002; 42(6): 2184 - 2192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S. Montes-Hernandez and L. E. Eguiarte
Genetic structure and indirect estimates of gene flow in three taxa of Cucurbita (Cucurbitaceae) in western Mexico
Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2002; 89(7): 1156 - 1163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1976 by the Crop Science Society of America.