Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 16:277-280 (1976)
© 1976 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hatchett, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Hartwig, E. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hatchett, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Hartwig, E. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hatchett, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Hartwig, E. E.

Leaf-feeding Resistance to Bollworm and Tobacco Budworm in Three Soybean Plant Introductions1

J. H. Hatchett2, G. L. Beland2 and E. E. Hartwig3

Three plant introductions (PI 171451, PI 227687, and PI 229358) of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] having resistance to the Mexican bean beetle [Epilachna variveslis Mulsant] were evaluated in the laboratory for leaffeeding resistance (antibiosis) to the bollworm [Heliothis zea (Boddie)] and tobacco budworm [H. virescens (Fabricius)]. Five commercial cultivars were used for comparison. Criteria for antibiosis were larval mortality, larval and pupal weights, and duration of larval stage. All three plant introductions were resistant to both species. Among larvae fed on the plant introductions, mortality was greater than among larvae fed on the commercial cultivars, weight gains of larvae were reduced and time to pupation was greater. On the basis of percentage of larval mortality, PI 171451 and PI 229358 were more resistant to the bollworm than to the tobacco budworm; PI 227687 was equally resistant to both species. None of the larvae of either species survived on PI 227687, which suggests that this plant introduction may have a different genetic basis for resistance.

Key Words: Heliothis zea (Boddie) • Heliothis virescem (Fabricius) • Glycine max (L.) Merr. • Host plant resistance • Antibiosis


1 Cooperative research between the ARS-USDA and the Delta Branch, Mississippi Agric. and Forestry Exp. Stn., Stoneville, Miss.

2 Research entomologists, Bioenvironmental Insect Control Laboratory, ARS-USDA, Stoneville, MS 38776.

3 Research agronomist, ARS-USDA, Stoneville, MS 38776.

Received for publication August 20, 1975.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
K. Komatsu, S. Okuda, M. Takahashi, R. Matsunaga, and Y. Nakazawa
QTL Mapping of Antibiosis Resistance to Common Cutworm (Spodoptera litura Fabricius) in Soybean
Crop Sci., August 26, 2005; 45(5): 2044 - 2048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
T. Mebrahtu, M. Kraemer, and T. Andebrhan
Evaluation of Soybean Breeding Lines for Corn Earworm Antibiosis
Crop Sci., September 1, 2002; 42(5): 1465 - 1470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1976 by the Crop Science Society of America.