Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 16:256-259 (1976)
© 1976 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Busch, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Frohberg, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Busch, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Frohberg, R. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Busch, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Frohberg, R. C.

Stability and Performance of Hard Red Spring Wheat Bulks for Grain Yield1

R. H. Busch, J. Hammond and R. C. Frohberg2

Twenty-eight hybrid populations resulting from crosses among eight high-yielding parents of hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em Thell.) were evaluated as F1's in one environment, as F2 bulks in six environments, and as F3 bulks in five environments. The average yields of the F2 and F3 bulks were similar to midparent performance across environments. Neither the F2 nor the F3 bulk generations exhibited superior yield performance in stress environments when compared to their midparents. Performance of the bulks varied from 95.9 to 110.9% of midparent across environments. The yield rank of each generation bulk was generally consistent from F2 to F3 (r=0.87, significant at the 0.01 probability level) since the same seven crosses (top 25%) would have been chosen with either generation yield test. The F2 bulk yields also were associated with midparent yields (r=0.73, 0.01 level) and F1 yields (r=0.73, 0.01 level). Parents were included in each trial, however, the Fa bulks were tested together with F2 bulks in only two of the environments. The F2 bulk yields, averaged over environments, correlated as well with the F1 yields as with midparent.

Regression analyses of response to environments for yield indicated that bulks had the same range of b values as parents. Average deviations from regression were smaller for bulks than for parents, but the deviations did not differ significantly. Parental deviations from regression for yield were correlated with gca (general combining ability) effects of their progeny (r=0.72, 0.05 level), but gca effects for response (b) were not significantly associated (r=0.49). Deviations from regression apparently were inherited from the parents in a relatively more predictable manner than response (b) to environments.

Key Words: General combining ability • Bulk selection • Triticum aestivum L. em Thell.


1 Contribution from North Dakota Agric. Exp. Stn., North Dakota State Univ. Contribution No. 624.

2 Associate professors and professor of agronomy, respectively, Dep. of Agronomy, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58102.

Received for publication June 26, 1975.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1976 by the Crop Science Society of America.